Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27390662›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2016

Representative sampling of natural biofilms: influence of substratum type on the bacterial and fungal communities structure.

Jennifer Hellal, Caroline Michel, Vanessa Barsotti, Valérie Laperche, Francis Garrido, Catherine Joulian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Impacts of biofilms on the conversion of cellulose.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  4. Designing field-based investigations of organic micropollutant fate in rivers.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer HellalDépartement Eau Environnement Ecotechnologies, BRGM D3E/BGE, 3 Av. Claude Guillemin, BP. 36009, 45060 Orléans Cedex 2, France.
Caroline MichelDépartement Eau Environnement Ecotechnologies, BRGM D3E/BGE, 3 Av. Claude Guillemin, BP. 36009, 45060 Orléans Cedex 2, France.
Vanessa BarsottiDépartement Eau Environnement Ecotechnologies, BRGM D3E/BGE, 3 Av. Claude Guillemin, BP. 36009, 45060 Orléans Cedex 2, France.
Valérie LapercheDépartement Eau Environnement Ecotechnologies, BRGM D3E/BGE, 3 Av. Claude Guillemin, BP. 36009, 45060 Orléans Cedex 2, France.
Francis GarridoDépartement Eau Environnement Ecotechnologies, BRGM D3E/BGE, 3 Av. Claude Guillemin, BP. 36009, 45060 Orléans Cedex 2, France.
Catherine JoulianDépartement Eau Environnement Ecotechnologies, BRGM D3E/BGE, 3 Av. Claude Guillemin, BP. 36009, 45060 Orléans Cedex 2, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In situ biofilm sampling is a key step for the study of natural biofilms and using methodologies that reflect natural diversity is necessary to guarantee representative sampling. Here, we focalise on the impact of the type of substrata on which biofilms grow on bacterial and fungal communities' structure. The indirect molecular approach, Denaturing Gel Gradient Electrophoresis (DGGE) of a gene fragment coding for either 16S rRNA or 28S rRNA, for bacteria or fungi respectively, was used to evaluate the variability of microbial community structures among different biofilm substrata: natural (pebbles, live plants, wood and sediment), or artificial (glass, Plexiglas(®) and sterile wood), in a small river (the Loiret, France). Multivariate statistics, band richness and diversity indexes (Shannon and Simpson) were used to highlight variations in community structure between substrata. Results showed variations of bacterial and fungal diversity between different substrata according to substratum properties/origin (natural or artificial, organic or inorganic) but there was no optimal substratum for sampling, and artificial substrata were not significantly less applicable than natural substrata. Pooling 4 different substrata types allowed a higher bacterial and fungal biodiversity recovery. Point contact sampling may thus gain in robustness by increasing the number of substrata considered. Fungal species richness was similar to the bacterial one on most substrata which suggested they should be more frequently considered in riverine biofilm studies.

Indexed as

BacteriaDGGEFreshwaterFungiNatural biofilmSampling strategySampling substrata

Identifiers

PMID27390662
PMCPMC4916114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.