Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27390582›Full record

ArticleCurrent urology2016

Intraoperative Frozen Section of the Prostate Reduces the Risk of Positive Margin Whilst Ensuring Nerve Sparing in Patients with Intermediate and High-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: First Reported UK Series.

Nikhil Vasdev, Samita Agarwal, Bhavan P Rai, Arany Soosainathan, Gregory Shaw, Sebastian Chang, Venkat Prasad, Gowrie Mohan-S, James M Adshead

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03317990 (A Single Blinded, IDEAL Stage 3, Multi-Centre, Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess NeuroSAFE Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03317990 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Single Blinded, IDEAL Stage 3, Multi-Centre, Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess NeuroSAFE Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) vs Standard Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) in Men With Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2018 to 2027Enrolled407ConditionsProstate CancerArmsNeuroSAFE procedure, Standard RARP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparing histologic evaluation of prostate tissue using nonlinear microscopy and paraffin H&E: a pilot study.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nikhil VasdevHertfordshire and South Bedfordshire Robotic Urological Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK; School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Samita AgarwalDepartment of Histopathology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Bhavan P RaiHertfordshire and South Bedfordshire Robotic Urological Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Arany SoosainathanHertfordshire and South Bedfordshire Robotic Urological Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Gregory ShawHertfordshire and South Bedfordshire Robotic Urological Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Sebastian ChangDepartment of Radiology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Venkat PrasadDepartment of Anaesthetics, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Gowrie Mohan-SDepartment of Anaesthetics, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
James M AdsheadHertfordshire and South Bedfordshire Robotic Urological Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Lister Hospital · GBUniversity of Bedfordshire · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNerve sparing during robotic radical prostatectomy (RRP) considerably improves post-operative potency and urinary continence as long as it does not compromise oncological outcome. Excision of the neurovascular bundle (NVB) is often performed in patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer to reduce the risk of positive surgical margin raising the risk of urinary incontinence and impotence. We present the first UK series outcomes of such patients who underwent an intra-operative frozen section (IOFS) analysis of the prostate during RRP allowing nerve sparing. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe prospectively analysed the data of 40 patients who underwent an IOFS during RRP at our centre from November 2012 until November 2014. Our IOFS technique involved whole lateral circumferential analysis of the prostate during RRP with the corresponding neurovascular tissue. An intrafascial nerve spare was performed and the specimen was removed intra-operatively via an extension of the 12 mm Autosuture™ camera port without undocking robotic arms. It was then painted by the surgeon and sprayed with "Ink Aid" prior to frozen section analysis. The corresponding NVB was excised if the histopathologist found a positive surgical margin on frozen section.

resultsMedian time to extract the specimen, wound closure and re-establishment of pneumoperitoneum increased the operative time by 8 min. Median blood loss for IOFS was 130 ± 97 ml vs. 90 ± 72 ml (p = NS). IOFS was not associated with major complications or with blood transfusion. PSM decreased significantly from non-IOFS RRP series of 28.7 to 7.8% (p < 0.05). Intra-operative PSM on the prostate specimen was seen in 8/40 margin analysis (20%) leading to an excision of the contra-lateral nerve bundle. On analysis of the nerve bundle on a paraffin embedded block, 6 nerve bundle matched tumor on the specimen whereas 2 NVB were retrospectively removed unnecessarily in our series. All 40 patients have undetectable PSA at a mean follow up of 21.2 months (SD 7.79). Functional data at 18 months confirms a reduction in the urinary incontinence from 37% in the IOFS group vs 57% in the non-IOFS group (p = NS). IOFS technique has resulted in a significant increase in intravesical nerve sparing in both T2/T3 patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer when appropriately counselled and selected (T2 from 100% in the IOFS group versus 67% and T3 from 100% in the IOFS group to 42%) (p < 0.05).

conclusionIntroduction of the IOFS analysis during intrafascial nerve spare RRP has reduced PSM and the rate of urinary incontinence.

Indexed as

Prostate adenocarcinomaRRP

Identifiers

PMID27390582
PMCPMC4911535
OpenAlexW2466945074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.