Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27390558›Full record

ArticleHand (New York, N.Y.)2016

Evaluation of Cold Sensitivity, Pain, and Quality of Life After Upper Extremity Nerve Injury.

Christine B Novak, Susan E Mackinnon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christine B NovakUniversity of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Susan E MackinnonWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, USA.
University of Toronto · CAWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between reported cold sensitivity, pain, and impact on quality of life (QoL) after upper extremity nerve injury.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included adults more than 6 months after an upper extremity nerve injury. Assessment included the Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (pain descriptors, questionnaire, pain intensity, impact on QoL), and Cold Intolerance Severity Scale (CISS). Statistical analyses evaluated the relationships between the Pain Evaluation Questionnaire, CISS, and independent variables.

resultsThere were 70 patients (mean age 42 ± 16 years). There were high levels of pain, cold sensitivity, and impact on QoL reported. Patients selecting the adjective "coldness" had significantly higher CISS scores (P = .005), pain intensity (P= .008), and impact on QoL (P < .006). Impact on QoL and CISS (r = .35) were moderately correlated. There were significant correlations (P < .01) between the level of cold-induced pain and CISS (r = .78), overall pain intensity (r = .58), pain descriptor score (r = .49), and impact on QoL (r = .32).

conclusionsCold-induced pain is associated with higher cold sensitivity scores and greater impact on QoL. Reporting a single descriptor "coldness" and ranking cold-induced symptoms were strongly associated with higher cold sensitivity scores and impact on health-related QoL. This may have important implications for quick screening to identify patients with cold sensitivity, and future studies in larger patient samples are necessary to provide additional evidence.

Indexed as

cold sensitivityevaluationpainquality of life

Identifiers

PMID27390558
PMCPMC4920539
OpenAlexW2302237994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.