Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27390544›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of radiology

Diffusion-Weighted MRI of Malignant versus Benign Portal Vein Thrombosis.

Jhii-Hyun Ahn, Jeong-Sik Yu, Eun-Suk Cho, Jae-Joon Chung, Joo Hee Kim, Ki Whang Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of radiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Tumor thrombus: incidence, imaging, prognosis and treatment.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jhii-Hyun AhnDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul 06273, Korea.
Jeong-Sik YuDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul 06273, Korea.
Eun-Suk ChoDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul 06273, Korea.
Jae-Joon ChungDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul 06273, Korea.
Joo Hee KimDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul 06273, Korea.
Ki Whang KimDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul 06273, Korea.
Gangnam Severance Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo validate the diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) for differentiation of benign from malignant portal vein thrombosis. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study and waived informed consent. A total of 59 consecutive patients (52 men and 7 women, aged 40-85 years) with grossly defined portal vein thrombus (PVT) on hepatic MRI were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, liver cirrhosis was found in 45 patients, and hepatocellular carcinoma in 47 patients. DWI was performed using b values of 50 and 800 sec/mm(2) at 1.5-T unit. A thrombus was considered malignant if it enhanced on dynamic CT or MRI; otherwise, it was considered bland. There were 18 bland thrombi and 49 malignant thrombi in 59 patients, including 8 patients with simultaneous benign and malignant PVT. Mean apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of benign and malignant PVTs were compared by using Mann-Whitney U test. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

resultsThe mean ADC ± standard deviation of bland and malignant PVT were 1.00 ± 0.39 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec and 0.92 ± 0.25 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec, respectively; without significant difference (p = 0.799). The area under ROC curve for ADC was 0.520. An ADC value of > 1.35 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec predicted bland PVT with a specificity of 94.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 84.9-98.9%) and a sensitivity of 22.2% (95% CI: 6.4-47.6%), respectively.

conclusionDue to the wide range and considerable overlap of the ADCs, DWI cannot differentiate the benign from malignant thrombi efficiently.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveCarcinoma, HepatocellularDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPortal VeinRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityApparent diffusion coefficientDiagnosisDiffusion weighted MRIHepatocellular carcinomaHepatomaMRIPortal vein thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID27390544
PMCPMC4936175
OpenAlexW2471907470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.