Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27390319›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2016

Wall Apposition Is a Key Factor for Aneurysm Occlusion after Flow Diversion: A Histologic Evaluation in 41 Rabbits.

A Rouchaud, C Ramana, W Brinjikji, Y-H Ding, D Dai, T Gunderson, J Cebral, D F Kallmes, R Kadirvel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Comaneci stent-angioplasty for the optimization of inadequately deployed flow diverter stents.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  4. A novel endoleak classification for intracranial aneurysm flow diversion: A retrospective case series.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Dyna three-dimensional imaging enables reliable evaluation of neointimal formation after flow diverter treatment.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Intraluminal Flow Diverter Design Primer for Neurointerventionalists.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

A RouchaudFrom the Applied Neuroradiology Laboratory (A.R., C.R., W.B., Y.-H.D., D.D., D.F.K., R.K.) aymeric.rouchaud@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0902-3375
C RamanaFrom the Applied Neuroradiology Laboratory (A.R., C.R., W.B., Y.-H.D., D.D., D.F.K., R.K.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7258-6456
W BrinjikjiFrom the Applied Neuroradiology Laboratory (A.R., C.R., W.B., Y.-H.D., D.D., D.F.K., R.K.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5271-5524
Y-H DingFrom the Applied Neuroradiology Laboratory (A.R., C.R., W.B., Y.-H.D., D.D., D.F.K., R.K.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4329-3192
D DaiFrom the Applied Neuroradiology Laboratory (A.R., C.R., W.B., Y.-H.D., D.D., D.F.K., R.K.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4051-6450
T GundersonHealth Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (T.G.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1678-8774
J CebralDepartment of Bioengineering (J.C.), George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3216-0856
D F KallmesFrom the Applied Neuroradiology Laboratory (A.R., C.R., W.B., Y.-H.D., D.D., D.F.K., R.K.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8495-0040
R KadirvelFrom the Applied Neuroradiology Laboratory (A.R., C.R., W.B., Y.-H.D., D.D., D.F.K., R.K.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6786-9953
DSM (Netherlands) · NLBicêtre Hospital · FRGeorge Mason University · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Computational and Biological Approach to Flow DiversionR01NS076491 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Juan R Cebral, DAVID F KALLMES · 2011 to 2026
$7.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeRobust wall apposition for flow-diverter stents may be important for endothelialization. Using a large series of experimental aneurysms treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device, the objectives of this study were to 1) assess interobserver agreement for the evaluation of wall apposition on posttreatment DSA and evaluate its association with aneurysm occlusion, and 2) measure the relationship between wall apposition assessed with histology and aneurysm occlusion rate after treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsSaccular aneurysms were created in 41 rabbits and treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device. DSA was performed just after the deployment of the device and at follow-up. Three investigators independently graded wall apposition on posttreatment DSA as good or poor. A histopathologist blinded to the angiographic results graded the wall apposition on histologic samples. We examined the correlation between angiographic occlusion and wall apposition with histology and angiography.

resultsWall apposition evaluated on histology was strongly associated with saccular aneurysm occlusion. Sensitivity and specificity of wall apposition to predict complete occlusion at follow-up were 76.9% and 84.0%, respectively, with an overall accuracy of 81.6%. In this experimental study, DSA was suboptimal to assess flow-diverter apposition, with moderate interobserver agreement and low accuracy.

conclusionsGood wall apposition is strongly associated with complete occlusion after flow-diverter therapy. In this study, DSA was suboptimal for assessing wall apposition of flow-diverter stents. These findings suggest that improved tools for assessing flow diverter-stent wall apposition are highly relevant.

Identifiers

PMID27390319
PMCPMC5219872
OpenAlexW2461227813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.