Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27390264›Full record

ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2016

Liver metastases: Microenvironments and ex-vivo models.

Amanda M Clark, Bo Ma, D Lansing Taylor, Linda Griffith, Alan Wells

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. LAMA4Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Multiple liver metastases of unknown origin: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda M ClarkDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Bo MaDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
D Lansing TaylorDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA Drug Discovery Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Linda GriffithDepartment of Biological Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Alan WellsDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA Pittsburgh VA Medical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA 15240, USA wellsa@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USIIT@MIT · USMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine · US

Funding

VIRUS PRODUCTION COREP30CA014051 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MATTHEW G. VANDER HEIDEN · 1985 to 2026
$93.9M
Measuring the Temporal-Spatial Responses of Dormancy and Drug Resistance in a Human Breast Cancer Metastatic Niche within a Liver-on-a-Chip Microphysiological PlatformUH3TR000503 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TAYLOR, D. LANSING · 2014 to 2016
$6.2M
Probing the Role of the Tumor Microenvironment on Mechanistic Biomarkers for Chemotherapeutic ResistanceUH3TR000496 · NCATS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GRIFFITH, LINDA G · 2014 to 2016
$3.5M
Molecular Regulation of Cancer ProgressionI01BX001017 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI WELLS, ALAN · 2012 to 2015
–
Molecular Regulation of Breast Cancer ProgressionI01BX003368 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI WELLS, ALAN · 2016 to 2023
–
BLRD VA I01 BX001017BLRD VA I01 BX003368NCATS NIH HHS UH3 TR000496NCATS NIH HHS UH3 TR000503NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The liver is a highly metastasis-permissive organ, tumor seeding of which usually portends mortality. Its unique and diverse architectural and cellular composition enable the liver to undertake numerous specialized functions, however, this distinctive biology, notably its hemodynamic features and unique microenvironment, renders the liver intrinsically hospitable to disseminated tumor cells. The particular focus for this perspective is the bidirectional interactions between the disseminated tumor cells and the unique resident cell populations of the liver; notably, parenchymal hepatocytes and non-parenchymal liver sinusoidal endothelial, Kupffer, and hepatic stellate cells. Understanding the early steps in the metastatic seeding, including the decision to undergo dormancy versus outgrowth, has been difficult to study in 2D culture systems and animals due to numerous limitations. In response, tissue-engineered biomimetic systems have emerged. At the cutting-edge of these developments are ex vivo 'microphysiological systems' (MPS) which are cellular constructs designed to faithfully recapitulate the structure and function of a human organ or organ regions on a milli- to micro-scale level and can be made all human to maintain species-specific interactions. Hepatic MPSs are particularly attractive for studying metastases as in addition to the liver being a main site of metastatic seeding, it is also the principal site of drug metabolism and therapy-limiting toxicities. Thus, using these hepatic MPSs will enable not only an enhanced understanding of the fundamental aspects of metastasis but also allow for therapeutic agents to be fully studied for efficacy while also monitoring pharmacologic aspects and predicting toxicities. The review discusses some of the hepatic MPS models currently available and although only one MPS has been validated to relevantly modeling metastasis, it is anticipated that the adaptation of the other hepatic models to include tumors will not be long in coming.

Indexed as

BiomimeticsHepatic Stellate CellsHumansKupffer CellsLiverNeoplasm MetastasisTumor Microenvironmenthepatic nicheLiver metastasismetastatic modelsmicrophysiologicaltumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID27390264
PMCPMC4999624
OpenAlexW2468162155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.