Trial reportArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2017
Post Hoc Analysis of the Phase II/III APRIL-SLE Study: Association Between Response to Atacicept and Serum Biomarkers Including BLyS and APRIL.
Trial report in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05666336 (Proteomics Combined With Metabolomics Studies on the Efficacy of Telitacicept in Chinese Patients of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Proteomics Combined With Metabolomics Studies on the Efficacy of Telitacicept in Chinese Patients of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Biologics in the Treatment of Lupus Erythematosus: A Critical Literature Review.BioMed research international · 2019Pooled it
- Review
- Redefining Difficult-to-Treat Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Biomarkers of Molecular Refractoriness Beyond Clinical Failure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Immune cell aberrations in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: navigating the targeted therapies toward precision management.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2025Review
- [Innovative treatments in rheumatology].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2025Review
- Systemic lupus erythematosus: updated insights on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention and therapeutics.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Immunotargets and Therapy for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2025Review
- The role of B cell-activating factor system in autoimmune diseases: mechanisms, disease implications, and therapeutic advances.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- The molecular subtypes of autoimmune diseases.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Efficacy and safety of telitacicept therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus with hematological involvement.Clinical rheumatology · 2024Article
- The Latest Progress in the Application of Telitacicept in Autoimmune Diseases.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Review
- Identifying lupus Patient Subsets Through Immune Cell Deconvolution of Gene Expression Data in Two Atacicept Phase II Studies.ACR open rheumatology · 2023Article
- Efficacy and Safety of New B Cell-Targeted Biologic Agent for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Precision medicine in systemic lupus erythematosus.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2023Review
- Cytokines as Biomarkers in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Value for Diagnosis and Drug Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Distinct patterns of disease activity over time in patients with active SLE revealed using latent class trajectory models.Arthritis research & therapy · 2021Article
- Clinical disease activity and flare in SLE: Current concepts and novel biomarkers.Journal of autoimmunity · 2021Review
- Emerging B-Cell Therapies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2021Review
- New therapeutic strategies in systemic lupus erythematosus management.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2019Review
- Integrated safety profile of atacicept: an analysis of pooled data from the atacicept clinical trial programme.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the relationship between treatment response, baseline biomarker levels, and atacicept exposure in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the phase II/III APRIL-SLE study.
methodsWe performed a post hoc analysis of patients who received placebo, atacicept 75 mg, or atacicept 150 mg in a randomized, controlled, 52-week trial. Serum levels of BlyS and APRIL were measured at baseline, and serum levels of Ig and the numbers of naive B cells and plasma cells were measured at baseline and during treatment. Atacicept exposure was determined by assessment of the serum trough concentrations throughout the 52-week trial period. Associations between these parameters, treatment response (reduction in British Isles Lupus Assessment Group A or B flare), and infection rates were explored.
resultsRecurrent high baseline levels of both BLyS (≥1.6 ng/ml) and APRIL (≥2.2 ng/ml) correlated with a greater treatment response (flare rate 75.7% with placebo, and 50.0% and 32.0% with atacicept 75 mg and atacicept 150 mg, respectively) compared with lower baseline levels of both. Increased atacicept exposure correlated with reduced flare rates (60.5% with placebo; 63.4%, 61.0%, 48.8%, and 29.3% in the 4 quartiles, from lowest to highest atacicept exposure). Greater pharmacodynamic responses (reduced Ig levels and naive B cell and plasma cell numbers) were associated with greater reductions in the flare rate. Infection rates were similar regardless of biomarker levels at baseline or at the time of atacicept exposure.
conclusionThese post hoc analyses demonstrate a dose-response relationship between atacicept concentrations, reduced Ig levels, and reduced flare rates and suggest that baseline biomarkers such as elevated serum levels of BLyS and APRIL may help to identify the patients who are most likely to benefit from atacicept treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.