Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27390118›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2017

The Relationship between the Methylated Septin-9 DNA Blood Test and Stool Occult Blood Test for Diagnosing Colorectal Cancer in Taiwanese People.

Chung-Hung Chen, Sheng-Lei Yan, Tsung-Hsun Yang, Shih-Feng Chen, Yung-Hsiang Yeh, Jing-Jim Ou, Chien-Hua Lin, Yueh-Tsung Lee, Chien-Hua Chen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Methylated Septin9 (mCancer research communications · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. MethylatedOncotarget · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chung-Hung ChenDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Sheng-Lei YanDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Tsung-Hsun YangDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Shih-Feng ChenDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Yung-Hsiang YehDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Jing-Jim OuDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Chien-Hua LinDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Yueh-Tsung LeeDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Chien-Hua ChenDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Hua Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Memorial Hospital of South Bend · USChang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is a common and lethal disease in the world. There is an increasing number of cases in Taiwan and a higher rate at advanced stages. The immune fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) has been used as a screening method in Taiwan for years. A new novel diagnostic tool, the Methylated Septin-9 (MS-9) DNA blood test, had been reported to have high sensitivity and specificity for CRC detection. There are no available data in Taiwan, so we conducted this prospective randomized trial to investigate the relationship among the MS-9 DNA blood test, iFOBT, and a combination of the two tests for diagnosing CRC in Taiwanese people.

methodsFrom July 1, 2012 to December 31, 2013, we prospectively selected 60 plasma samples from patients who were diagnosed with CRC and otherwise, the healthy group by colonoscopy in our hospital. Patients were divided into the CRC group and healthy group. CRC stages 0, I, II and stages III and IV were separately analyzed. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of each group to determine the relationship among the MS-9 DNA blood test, iFOBT, and a combination of the two tests for diagnosing CRC in Taiwanese people.

resultsThe results of the MS-9 DNA blood test for the 60 samples were divided into three groups, and the sensitivity as well as the specificity of the MS-9 DNA blood test to detect CRC were 47% and 89%, respectively. The results of iFOBT were also divided into three groups, and had higher sensitivity (84%) but lower specificity (55%) using iFOBT to detect CRC. Higher rates could be predicted to detect CRC if both the tests were positive.

conclusionsA combined MS-9 DNA blood test and iFOBT may help in a higher detection rate of CRC. It could be offered to individuals who are unwilling or unable to undergo colonoscopy. Further large prospective, randomized studies are needed in the future.

Indexed as

Occult BloodAgedArea Under CurveColorectal NeoplasmsDNA MethylationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificitySeptinsTaiwanSEPTIN9 protein, humanSeptinscolorectal cancerimmune fecal occult blood testmethylated Septin-9 DNA blood test

Identifiers

PMID27390118
PMCPMC6817212
OpenAlexW2463124610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.