Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27390111›Full record

Trial reportJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2016

Attentional bias training in girls at risk for depression.

Joelle LeMoult, Jutta Joormann, Katharina Kircanski, Ian H Gotlib

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Depression: A cognitive perspective.Clinical psychology review · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joelle LeMoultDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, California, CA, USA. jlemoult@stanford.edu.
Jutta JoormannDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Katharina KircanskiDepartment of Health and Human Services, Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ian H GotlibDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, California, CA, USA.
Stanford University · USNational Institute of Mental Health · USYale University · US

Funding

Risk for Depression:Identifying and Altering Psychobiological MechanismsR01MH074849 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOTLIB, IAN H · 2006 to 2015
$6.2M
Reducing Rumination in Depression: Developing and Testing a Novel InterventionF32MH102013 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LEMOULT, JOELLE LOREN · 2013 to 2015
$159k
Stress Depression and Anxiety - An Integrative Psychobiological InvestigationF32MH096385 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KIRCANSKI, KATHARINA · 2012 to 2014
$150k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH096385NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH102013NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study examined, for the first time, whether attentional biases can be modified in adolescents at risk for depression.

methodsThe final sample consisted of 41 girls at familial risk for depression, who were randomly assigned to receive six sessions (864 trials) of real or sham attention bias training [Real attentional bias training (ABT) vs. Sham ABT]. Participants who received Real ABT completed a modified dot-probe task designed to train attention toward positive and away from negative facial expressions; in contrast, girls who received Sham ABT completed the standard dot-probe task. Attentional biases, self-reported mood, and psychophysiological responses to stress were measured at pre- and post-training assessments.

resultsAs expected, girls who received Real ABT, but not those who received Sham ABT, exhibited significant increases from pre- to post-training in their attention toward happy faces and away from sad faces. Moreover, adolescents who received Real ABT were buffered against the negative outcomes experienced by adolescents who received Sham ABT. Specifically, only adolescents who received Sham ABT experienced an increase in negative mood and a pre- to post-training increase in heart rate in anticipation of the stressor.

conclusionsThe current findings provide the first experimental evidence that attentional biases can be modified in youth at risk for depression and further suggest that ABT modulates the heightened response to stress that is otherwise experienced by high-risk adolescents.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionOutcome Assessment, Health CareAdolescentAttentional BiasFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderPsychotherapyadolescentsAttention bias modificationdepression

Identifiers

PMID27390111
PMCPMC5093061
OpenAlexW2463206023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.