Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27389942›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery2016

Protamine Reduces Bleeding Complications without Increasing the Risk of Stroke after Carotid Endarterectomy: A Meta-analysis.

J D Kakisis, C N Antonopoulos, K G Moulakakis, F Schneider, G Geroulakos, J B Ricco

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07288164 (Comparison of Operative and Early Postoperative Outcomes Between Eversion and Conventional Techniques in Carotid Endarterectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07288164 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Operative and Early Postoperative Outcomes Between Eversion and Conventional Techniques in Carotid Endarterectomy

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorKastamonu UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled129ConditionsAtherosclerosis Occlusive Disease, Stroke (CVA) or Transient Ischemic Attack, Endarterectomy, CarotidArmsCarotid endarterectomy, conventional, Carotid endarterectomy, eversion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anesthetic management of carotid endarterectomy: an update from Italian guidelines.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J D KakisisDepartment of Vascular Surgery, "Attikon" Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. Electronic address: kakisis@med.uoa.gr.
C N AntonopoulosDepartment of Vascular Surgery, "Attikon" Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
K G MoulakakisDepartment of Vascular Surgery, "Attikon" Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
F SchneiderDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Jean-Bernard Hospital, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
G GeroulakosDepartment of Vascular Surgery, "Attikon" Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
J B RiccoDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Jean-Bernard Hospital, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversité de Poitiers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of heparin reversal with protamine after completion of carotid endarterectomy (CEA), summarising the available data from both randomised and non-randomised studies.

methodsThe study was a meta-analysis. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for the outcomes of stroke and wound haematoma among patients receiving or not receiving protamine after CEA. Meta-regression analysis was performed to examine whether the documented differences were modified by potentially meaningful patient related or procedure related predictors, namely publication year, general anesthesia used, number of patients treated, mean age (years), males, neurological symptoms, use of patch, and use of shunt.

resultsSeven studies were included in the meta-analysis reporting on 3,817 patients receiving protamine after CEA and 6,070 patients not receiving protamine for heparin reversal. Only one study was randomised. A statistically significant reduction in wound haematoma requiring re-operation was recorded after heparin reversal with protamine in patients undergoing CEA (OR, 0.42, 95% CI, 0.22-0.80, p = .008). In contrast, no significant difference was observed in stroke rates between groups of patients that received and did not receive protamine (OR, 0.71, 95% CI, 0.49-1.03, p = .07). Meta-regression analysis did not reveal any significant effect mediated by the modifiers examined.

conclusionOn the basis of the available data, heparin reversal with protamine seems to reduce the risk of wound haematoma, without increasing the risk of procedural stroke. However, taking into account the limitations of the analysis, further studies are needed to increase the level of evidence provided by the current meta-analysis.

Indexed as

Endarterectomy, CarotidHeparin AntagonistsHumansPostoperative HemorrhageProtaminesStrokeHeparin AntagonistsProtaminesCarotid endarterectomyHaematomaHeparinMeta-analysisProtamineStroke

Identifiers

PMID27389942
OpenAlexW2467878454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.