Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27389803›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2016

Convergent evidence for hierarchical prediction networks from human electrocorticography and magnetoencephalography.

Holly N Phillips, Alejandro Blenkmann, Laura E Hughes, Silvia Kochen, Tristan A Bekinschtein, Cam-Can, James B Rowe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. GABA-ergic Dynamics in Human Frontotemporal Networks Confirmed by Pharmaco-Magnetoencephalography.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Predictive encoding of auditory sequences in the human prefrontal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. What Do Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Responses Tell Us About Tinnitus?Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Sensory Target Detection at Local and Global Timescales Reveals a Hierarchy of Supramodal Dynamics in the Human Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  20. Neurophysiological and Brain Structural Markers of Cognitive Frailty Differ from Alzheimer's Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Holly N PhillipsDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, UK; Medical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: holly.phillips@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.
Alejandro BlenkmannInstitute of Cellular Biology and Neuroscience "Prof E. De Robertis" (IBCN), School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires - CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Epilepsy Center, El Cruce Hospital, Florencio Varela, Argentina; Epilepsy Section, Division Neurology, Ramos Mejía Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Electronic address: ablenkmann@gmail.com.
Laura E HughesDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, UK; Medical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: laura.hughes@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.
Silvia KochenInstitute of Cellular Biology and Neuroscience "Prof E. De Robertis" (IBCN), School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires - CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Epilepsy Center, El Cruce Hospital, Florencio Varela, Argentina; Epilepsy Section, Division Neurology, Ramos Mejía Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Electronic address: skochen@retina.ar.
Tristan A BekinschteinMedical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK; Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: tb419@cam.ac.uk.
Cam-CanMedical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN), University of Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: ccmanagement@cam-can.com.
James B RoweDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, UK; Medical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK; Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: James.Rowe@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H008217/1Medical Research Council G1000183Medical Research Council MC-A060-5PQ30Medical Research Council MC_U105597119Wellcome Trust 093875Wellcome Trust 103838Wellcome Trust WT093811MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose that sensory inputs are processed in terms of optimised predictions and prediction error signals within hierarchical neurocognitive models. The combination of non-invasive brain imaging and generative network models has provided support for hierarchical frontotemporal interactions in oddball tasks, including recent identification of a temporal expectancy signal acting on prefrontal cortex. However, these studies are limited by the need to invert magnetoencephalographic or electroencephalographic sensor signals to localise activity from cortical 'nodes' in the network, or to infer neural responses from indirect measures such as the fMRI BOLD signal. To overcome this limitation, we examined frontotemporal interactions estimated from direct cortical recordings from two human participants with cortical electrode grids (electrocorticography - ECoG). Their frontotemporal network dynamics were compared to those identified by magnetoencephalography (MEG) in forty healthy adults. All participants performed the same auditory oddball task with standard tones interspersed with five deviant tone types. We normalised post-operative electrode locations to standardised anatomic space, to compare across modalities, and inverted the MEG to cortical sources using the estimated lead field from subject-specific head models. A mismatch negativity signal in frontal and temporal cortex was identified in all subjects. Generative models of the electrocorticographic and magnetoencephalographic data were separately compared using the free-energy estimate of the model evidence. Model comparison confirmed the same critical features of hierarchical frontotemporal networks in each patient as in the group-wise MEG analysis. These features included bilateral, feedforward and feedback frontotemporal modulated connectivity, in addition to an asymmetric expectancy driving input on left frontal cortex. The invasive ECoG provides an important step in construct validation of the use of neural generative models of MEG, which in turn enables generalisation to larger populations. Together, they give convergent evidence for the hierarchical interactions in frontotemporal networks for expectation and processing of sensory inputs.

Indexed as

AdultBrainBrain MappingElectrocorticographyFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleModels, NeurologicalNerve NetYoung AdultCognitionDynamic causal modellingElectrocorticographyMagnetoencephalographyMismatch negativity

Identifiers

PMID27389803
PMCPMC4981429
OpenAlexW2346028837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.