Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27389624›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society2016

Research Registries: A Tool to Advance Understanding of Rare Neuro-Ophthalmic Diseases.

Kimberly D Blankshain, Heather E Moss

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Commentary: Rare eye diseases: More than meets the eye!Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The Influence of Patient Identification and Narrative Transportation on Intentions to Participate in Cancer Research.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kimberly D BlankshainChicago Medical School (KDB), Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Chicago, Illinois; and Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (KDB, HEM) and Neurology and Rehabilitation (HEM), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Heather E Moss

Funding

Translational Core for Therapeutic and Diagnostic DevelopmentP30EY001792 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MCANANY, JAMES JASON · 1985 to 2025
$14.8M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR029879 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MAZZONE, THEODORE · 2009 to 2011
$11.0M
UIC K12 Independent Clinical Vision Scientist Development ProgramK12EY021475 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI ALI R DJALILIAN, CHARLOTTE E JOSLIN · 2011 to 2026
$6.7M
Physiologically Based Markers of Idiopathic Intracranial HypertensionK23EY024345 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MOSS, HEATHER ELSPETH · 2014 to 2018
$1.1M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029879NEI NIH HHS K12 EY021475NEI NIH HHS K23 EY024345NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical research registries (MRR) are organized systems used to collect, store, and analyze patient information. They are important tools for medical research with particular application to the study of rare diseases, including those seen in neuro-ophthalmic practice. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Evidence for this review was gathered from the writers' experiences creating a comprehensive neuro-ophthalmology registry and review of the literature.

resultsMRR are typically observational and prospective databases of de-identified patient information. The structure is flexible and can accommodate a focus on specific diseases or treatments, surveillance of patient populations, physician quality improvement, or recruitment for future studies. They are particularly useful for the study of rare diseases. They can be integrated into the hierarchy of medical research at many levels provided their construction is well organized and they have several key characteristics including an easily manipulated database, comprehensive information on carefully selected patients, and comply with human subjects regulations. MRR pertinent to neuro-ophthalmology include the University of Illinois at Chicago neuro-ophthalmology registry, Susac Syndrome Registry, Intracranial Hypertension Registry, and larger-scale patient outcome registries being developed by professional societies.

conclusionMRR have a variety of forms and applications. With careful planning and clear goals, they are flexible and powerful research tools that can support multiple different study designs, and this can provide the potential to advance understanding and care of neuro-ophthalmic diseases.

Indexed as

NeurologyOphthalmologyRegistriesBiomedical ResearchDatabases, FactualEye DiseasesHumans

Identifiers

PMID27389624
PMCPMC4988906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.