ArticleDer Nervenarzt2017
[Analysis of the German state medical examination regarding psychiatrically relevant topics].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evidence-oriented teaching of geriatric psychiatry: a narrative literature synthesis and pilot evaluation of a clerkship seminar.GMS journal for medical education · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe second part of the state medical examination is an essential part of medical education in Germany. From 2006 until 2013, the second and third parts of the licensing examination were combined, thus earning this examination the reputation of being notoriously difficult to pass. The aim of this exploratory study was to examine psychiatric and psychotherapeutic questions in the written part of the second examination.
objectivesThis study analyzed the proportion of psychiatric and psychotherapeutic questions in the written part of the second leg of the German state medical examination. In a second step, a more detailed analysis aimed to identify more specific subject areas and to allocate diagnoses according to ICD-10, allowing a detailed overview of the presence of psychiatric topics. MATERIAL AND
methodsA total of 8 examinations from fall 2010 up to spring 2014 a were included in the analysis. Every examination comprised 320 questions, thus a total of 2560 questions were analyzed. All questions pertaining to psychiatric or psychotherapeutic topics were included. Questions were categorized according to a predefined set of subject areas and an ICD-10 diagnosis.
resultsOut of the total of 2560 questions analyzed, 166 were categorized as being in psychiatry or psychotherapy, with each examination comprising an average of 20.75 (SD = 5.80) relevant questions. Most questions were allocated to the subject area of pharmacology (n = 53), followed by psychopathologic assessment (n = 27) and psychotherapy (n = 12). Sorted according to ICD-10 criteria, most questions could be assigned to the F3 category, the affective disorders group (21.9 %, n = 35).
conclusionIn comparison to the actual strain placed on the healthcare system, the results indicate an underrepresentation of psychiatric disorders in the second part of the German state medical examination. The distribution of specific disorders mirrors the actual distribution at least in part; however, certain practically relevant disorders are severely underrepresented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27389597What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.