Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27388266›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of infection control2016

Bacteria emitted in ambient air during bronchoscopy-a risk to health care workers?

Geneviève Marchand, Caroline Duchaine, Jacques Lavoie, Marc Veillette, Yves Cloutier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of infection control, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Percutaneous Tracheostomy in COVID Era: Time to Adapt and Improvise.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Geneviève MarchandInstitut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et sécurité du travail, Montréal, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: marchand.genevieve@irsst.qc.ca.
Caroline DuchaineCentre de recherche de l'institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Quebec, Canada; Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Bioinformatics, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Jacques LavoieInstitut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et sécurité du travail, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Marc VeilletteCentre de recherche de l'institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Quebec, Canada.
Yves CloutierInstitut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et sécurité du travail, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care workers are at risk of occupational infections, and some procedures are known to increase this risk. The aim of this study was to qualify and quantify bioaerosol concentrations during bronchoscopy to estimate the occupational risk.

methodsFull-day sampling was conducted in 2 rooms while bronchoscopies were performed on patients. Two microbial air samplers were used, a wet wall cyclonic sampler and an impactor, on culture media. Identification of the culturable bacterial flora was performed with chromatographic analysis of cellular fatty acid of the isolated strain and additional biochemical tests if needed. Specific polymerase chain reaction analysis was completed on wet wall cyclonic samples for the detection of influenza A and B and Mycobacterium spp.

resultsA wide variety of bacteria were collected from the ambient air. All samples yielded at least 1 Staphylococcus species. Although most of the culturable bacteria identified were normal nonpathogenic flora, such as Streptococcus spp, Neisseria spp, and Corynebacterium spp, some opportunistic pathogens, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, were found. Neither Mycobacterium spp nor influenza virus was detected with the polymerase chain reaction method during this study.

conclusionsCulturable bacteria from oral, nasal, and pulmonary flora are aerosolized during bronchoscopy and could be inhaled by medical staff. The potential presence of pathogens in those aerosols could represent an occupational infection risk.

Indexed as

AerosolsAir MicrobiologyBronchoscopyHealth PersonnelOccupational ExposureBacteriaHumansMicrobiological TechniquesOrthomyxoviridaeRisk AssessmentAerosolsBioaerosolsIndoor airOccupational exposure

Identifiers

PMID27388266
PMCPMC7115340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.