New perspectives on forced migration in the history of twentieth-century neuroscience.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. [Persecution, expulsion, annihilation. Neurologists in the NS era-For active remembrance].Der Nervenarzt · 2022
   Review
2. [Persecution, expulsion and extermination of German-speaking neurologists during the NS era: attempt at an assessment].Der Nervenarzt · 2022
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Learning soft skills the hard way: Historiographical considerations on the cultural adjustment process of German-speaking émigré neuroscientists in Canada, 1933 to 1963.
• Commented on by
  Émigré scientists and the global turn in the history of science: A commentary on the special issue "New Perspectives on Forced Migration in the History of Twentieth-Century Neuroscience".

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as