Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27388233›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2016

Clinical Utility of Liquid Diagnostic Platforms in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Benjamin Levy, Zishuo I Hu, Kristen N Cordova, Sandra Close, Karen Lee, Daniel Becker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Comparison ofAmerican journal of translational research · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Serum-Based KRASFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin LevyIcahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA belevy@chpnet.org.
Zishuo I HuIcahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA.
Kristen N CordovaOncology Resource Group, San Francisco, California, USA.
Sandra CloseGenEngine Group, Carlsbad, California, USA.
Karen LeeIcahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA.
Daniel BeckerVeterans Affairs Hospital, New York University, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelled: A firmer understanding of the genomic landscape of lung cancer has recently led to targeted, therapeutic advances in non-small cell lung cancer. Historically, the reference standard for the diagnosis and genetic interrogation for advanced-stage patients has been tissue acquisition via computed tomography-guided core or fine needle aspiration biopsy. However, this process can frequently put the patient at risk and remains complicated by sample availability and tumor heterogeneity. In addition, the time required to complete the diagnostic assays can negatively affect clinical care. Technological advances in recent years have led to the development of blood-based diagnostics or "liquid biopsies" with great potential to quickly diagnose and genotype lung cancer using a minimally invasive technique. Recent studies have suggested that molecular alterations identified in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) or circulating tumor DNA can serve as an accurate molecular proxy of tumor biology and reliably predict the response to tyrosine kinase therapy. In addition, several trials have demonstrated the high accuracy of microRNA (miRNA) platforms in discerning cancerous versus benign nodules in high-risk, screened patients. Despite the promise of these platforms, issues remain, including varying sensitivities and specificities between competing platforms and a lack of standardization of techniques and downstream processing. In the present report, the clinical applications of liquid biopsy technologies, including circulating tumor cells, proteomics, miRNA, and cfDNA for NSCLC, are reviewed and insight is provided into the diagnostic and therapeutic implications and challenges of these platforms. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Although tumor biopsies remain the reference standard for the diagnosis and genotyping of non-small cell lung cancer, they remain fraught with logistical complexities that can delay treatment decisions and affect clinical care. Liquid diagnostic platforms, including cell-free DNA, proteomic signatures, RNA (mRNA and microRNA), and circulating tumor cells, have the potential to overcome many of these barriers, including rapid and accurate identification of de novo and resistant genetic alterations, real-time monitoring of treatment responses, prognosis of outcomes, and identification of minimal residual disease. The present report provides insights into new liquid diagnostic platforms in non-small cell lung cancer and discusses the promise and challenges of their current and future clinical use.

Indexed as

Neoplastic Cells, CirculatingProteomicsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCell-Free Nucleic AcidsGenotypeHumansMutationPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCell-free DNACirculating tumor cellsLiquid diagnosticsMicroRNANon-small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID27388233
PMCPMC5016074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.