ReviewThe oncologist2016
Clinical Utility of Liquid Diagnostic Platforms in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Review in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resectable lung lesions malignancy assessment and cancer detection by ultra-deep sequencing of targeted gene mutations in plasma cell-free DNA.Journal of medical genetics · 2019Trial
- A comprehensive database for identifying and interpreting ctDNA driver genes and variants in cancer.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Application of liquid biopsy in differentiating lung cancer from benign pulmonary nodules (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Current Evidence Supporting the Role of miRNA as a Biomarker for Lung Cancer Diagnosis Through Exhaled Breath Condensate Collection: A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The future of metronomic chemotherapy: experimental and computational approaches of drug repurposing.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2025Review
- Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Prognostic Monitoring Through Cell-Free RNA via Liquid Biopsy.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Review
- Functional tumor-derived exosomes in NSCLC progression and clinical implications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Chemotherapy related changes in cfDNA levels in squamous non-small cell lung cancer: correlation with symptom scores and radiological responses.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2024Article
- Comparison ofAmerican journal of translational research · 2022Article
- ESR/ERS statement paper on lung cancer screening.European radiology · 2020Review
- Serum-Based KRASFrontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Graphene Oxide-Based Biosensors for Liquid Biopsies in Cancer Diagnosis.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- The biological functions and clinical applications of exosomes in lung cancer.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019Review
- In silico identification of thiostrepton as an inhibitor of cancer stem cell growth and an enhancer for chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2019Article
- Targeted deep sequencing from multiple sources demonstrates increased NOTCH1 alterations in lung cancer patient plasma.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
- IQN path ASBL report from the first European cfDNA consensus meeting: expert opinion on the minimal requirements for clinical ctDNA testing.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2019Article
- Potential Utility of Liquid Biopsy as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool for the Assessment of Solid Tumors: Implications in the Precision Oncology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Long-lasting response to afatinib that persisted after treatment discontinuation in a case ofBMJ case reports · 2019Article
- Implementation of Novel Molecular Biomarkers for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the Netherlands: How to Deal With Increasing Complexity.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Review
- Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) for the noninvasive monitoring and personalization of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) therapies.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelled: A firmer understanding of the genomic landscape of lung cancer has recently led to targeted, therapeutic advances in non-small cell lung cancer. Historically, the reference standard for the diagnosis and genetic interrogation for advanced-stage patients has been tissue acquisition via computed tomography-guided core or fine needle aspiration biopsy. However, this process can frequently put the patient at risk and remains complicated by sample availability and tumor heterogeneity. In addition, the time required to complete the diagnostic assays can negatively affect clinical care. Technological advances in recent years have led to the development of blood-based diagnostics or "liquid biopsies" with great potential to quickly diagnose and genotype lung cancer using a minimally invasive technique. Recent studies have suggested that molecular alterations identified in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) or circulating tumor DNA can serve as an accurate molecular proxy of tumor biology and reliably predict the response to tyrosine kinase therapy. In addition, several trials have demonstrated the high accuracy of microRNA (miRNA) platforms in discerning cancerous versus benign nodules in high-risk, screened patients. Despite the promise of these platforms, issues remain, including varying sensitivities and specificities between competing platforms and a lack of standardization of techniques and downstream processing. In the present report, the clinical applications of liquid biopsy technologies, including circulating tumor cells, proteomics, miRNA, and cfDNA for NSCLC, are reviewed and insight is provided into the diagnostic and therapeutic implications and challenges of these platforms. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Although tumor biopsies remain the reference standard for the diagnosis and genotyping of non-small cell lung cancer, they remain fraught with logistical complexities that can delay treatment decisions and affect clinical care. Liquid diagnostic platforms, including cell-free DNA, proteomic signatures, RNA (mRNA and microRNA), and circulating tumor cells, have the potential to overcome many of these barriers, including rapid and accurate identification of de novo and resistant genetic alterations, real-time monitoring of treatment responses, prognosis of outcomes, and identification of minimal residual disease. The present report provides insights into new liquid diagnostic platforms in non-small cell lung cancer and discusses the promise and challenges of their current and future clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.