Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27388232›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2016

Pretreatment Insulin Levels as a Prognostic Factor for Breast Cancer Progression.

Patrizia Ferroni, Silvia Riondino, Anastasia Laudisi, Ilaria Portarena, Vincenzo Formica, Jhessica Alessandroni, Roberta D'Alessandro, Augusto Orlandi, Leopoldo Costarelli, Francesco Cavaliere and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparative study of dexamethasone premedication regimens with docetaxel chemotherapy in early HER-2 positive breast cancer: A safety net hospital experience.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Postdiagnostic Dietary Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Dietary Insulin Index, and Insulin Load and Breast Cancer Survival.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Patrizia FerroniSan Raffaele Roma Open University, Rome, Italy patrizia.ferroni@sanraffaele.it.
Silvia RiondinoInterinstitutional Multidisciplinary Biobank, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy Department of Systems Medicine, Medical Oncology, Tor Vergata Clinical Center, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Anastasia LaudisiDepartment of Systems Medicine, Medical Oncology, Tor Vergata Clinical Center, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Ilaria PortarenaDepartment of Systems Medicine, Medical Oncology, Tor Vergata Clinical Center, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo FormicaDepartment of Systems Medicine, Medical Oncology, Tor Vergata Clinical Center, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Jhessica AlessandroniInterinstitutional Multidisciplinary Biobank, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.
Roberta D'AlessandroInterinstitutional Multidisciplinary Biobank, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.
Augusto OrlandiAnatomic Pathology, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Leopoldo CostarelliDepartment of Pathology, San Giovanni Hospital-Addolorata, Rome, Italy.
Francesco CavaliereDepartment of Surgery, San Giovanni Hospital-Addolorata, Rome, Italy.
Fiorella GuadagniSan Raffaele Roma Open University, Rome, Italy Interinstitutional Multidisciplinary Biobank, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.
Mario RoselliDepartment of Systems Medicine, Medical Oncology, Tor Vergata Clinical Center, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBased on the hypothesis that impaired glucose metabolism might be associated with survival outcomes independently of overt diabetes, we sought to investigate the prognostic value of routinely used glycemic parameters in a prospective study of breast cancer (BC) patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsFasting blood glucose, insulin and HbA1c levels, and insulin resistance (assessed by the Homeostasis Model Assessment [HOMA] index) at diagnosis were evaluated in 286 nondiabetic BC patients (249 with primary cancer, 37 with metastatic) with respect to those parameters' possible associations with clinicopathological features and survival outcomes. As a control group, 143 healthy women matched in a 2:1 ratio for age, blood lipid levels, and body mass index were also investigated.

resultsFasting blood glucose level (mean ± SD: 99 ± 26 vs. 85 ± 15 mg/dL), insulin level (median: 10.0 vs. 6.8 μIU/mL), and HOMA index (median: 2.2 vs. 1.4), but not HbA1c level, were significantly elevated in BC patients compared with control subjects. Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed comparable areas for blood glucose and insulin levels, and HOMA index (ranging from 0.668 to 0.671). Using a cutoff level of 13 μIU/mL, insulin had the best specificity (92%) and sensitivity (41%), was significantly associated with disease stage, and acted as a negative prognostic marker of progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 2.17; 95% confidence interval: 1.13-4.20) independently of menopausal status, disease stage, hormone receptor status, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and Ki67 expression.

conclusionThese results suggest that insulin determination might provide prognostic information in BC and support the hypothesis that lifestyle and/or pharmacological interventions targeting glucose metabolism could be considered to improve survival outcome of selected BC patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Pretreatment insulin levels may represent a biomarker of adverse prognosis in nondiabetic women with breast cancer, independently of other well-established prognostic factors (i.e., stage, hormone receptors, HER2/neu, and Ki67). This finding has important implications, because it provides the rationale for lifestyle or insulin-targeting pharmacologic interventions as a means of improving breast cancer outcomes not only in early stages, but also in advanced-stage breast cancer patients with aggressive tumor phenotypes (HER2-negative hormone-resistant, or triple-negative breast cancer), in which treatments are still challenging. The possibility of using insulin as a biomarker to guide insulin-targeted interventions also should be taken into account.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexBreast NeoplasmsDiabetes MellitusDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansInsulinInsulin ResistanceMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanInsulinBreast cancerInsulinInsulin resistancePrognostic value

Identifiers

PMID27388232
PMCPMC5016062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.