Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27388019›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

Intervertebral disc classification by its degree of degeneration from T2-weighted magnetic resonance images.

Isaac Castro-Mateos, Rui Hua, Jose M Pozo, Aron Lazary, Alejandro F Frangi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04239638 (Analysis of Cervical Spinal MRI With Deep Learning), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04239638 withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Analysis of Cervical Spinal MRI With Deep Learning

TypeobservationalSponsorBezmialem Vakif UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled0ConditionsCervical Disc Disease, Cervical Spine DiseaseArmsCervical Spinal MRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Are current machine learning applications comparable to radiologist classification of degenerate and herniated discs and Modic change? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision in Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deep learning-based high-accuracy detection for lumbar and cervical degenerative disease on T2-weighted MR images.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. External validation of the deep learning system "SpineNet" for grading radiological features of degeneration on MRIs of the lumbar spine.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. SPIE Computer-Aided Diagnosis conference anniversary review.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. ISSLS PRIZE IN BIOENGINEERING SCIENCE 2017: Automation of reading of radiological features from magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the lumbar spine without human intervention is comparable with an expert radiologist.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isaac Castro-MateosDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S1 3JD, UK. isaac.casm@sheff.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2745-426X
Rui HuaDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S1 3JD, UK.
Jose M PozoDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S1 3JD, UK.
Aron LazaryNational Center for Spinal Disorders (NCSD), Budapest, Hungary.
Alejandro F FrangiDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S1 3JD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe primary goal of this article is to achieve an automatic and objective method to compute the Pfirrmann's degeneration grade of intervertebral discs (IVD) from MRI. This grading system is used in the diagnosis and management of patients with low back pain (LBP). In addition, biomechanical models, which are employed to assess the treatment on patients with LBP, require this grading value to compute proper material properties. MATERIALS AND

methodsT2-weighted MR images of 48 patients were employed in this work. The 240 lumbar IVDs were divided into a training set (140) and a testing set (100). Three experts manually classified the whole set of IVDs using the Pfirrmann's grading system and the ground truth was selected as the most voted value among them. The developed method employs active contour models to delineate the boundaries of the IVD. Subsequently, the classification is achieved using a trained Neural Network (NN) with eight designed features that contain shape and intensity information of the IVDs.

resultsThe classification method was evaluated using the testing set, resulting in a mean specificity (95.5 %) and sensitivity (87.3 %) comparable to those of every expert with respect to the ground truth.

conclusionsOur results show that the automatic method and humans perform equally well in terms of the classification accuracy. However, human annotations have inherent inter- and intra-observer variabilities, which lead to inconsistent assessments. In contrast, the proposed automatic method is objective, being only dependent on the input MRI.

Indexed as

Intervertebral DiscIntervertebral Disc DegenerationAdultFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and Specificity2DActive contour modelAutomaticClassificationDegenerationIVDMRNeural network

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.