Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27387712›Full record

ReviewClinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry2016

Diagnosing sepsis - The role of laboratory medicine.

Shu-Ling Fan, Nancy S Miller, John Lee, Daniel G Remick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shu-Ling FanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine/Boston Medical Center, United States.
Nancy S MillerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine/Boston Medical Center, United States.
John LeeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine/Boston Medical Center, United States.
Daniel G RemickDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine/Boston Medical Center, United States. Electronic address: remickd@bu.edu.

Funding

Impact of Biological, Clinical, and Social Determinants on Trauma and Trauma OutcomesT32GM086308 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Alik Farber, Daniel G. Remick · 2010 to 2026
$3.5M
Adenosine and Oxygen Modulate Antimicrobial DefensesR01GM097320 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI REMICK, DANIEL G., SITKOVSKY, MICHAIL · 2011 to 2014
$1.2M
Mechanisms of phagocytic cell defects induced by inhibitory IgGR21AI112887 · NIAID · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI REMICK, DANIEL G. · 2014 to 2015
$450k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI112887NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097320NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM086308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is the host response to microbial pathogens resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. An accurate and timely diagnosis of sepsis allows prompt and appropriate treatment. This review discusses laboratory testing for sepsis because differentiating systemic inflammation from infection is challenging. Procalcitonin (PCT) is currently an FDA approved test to aid in the diagnosis of sepsis but with questionable efficacy. However, studies support the use of PCT for antibiotic de-escalation. Serial lactate measurements have been recommended for monitoring treatment efficacy as part of sepsis bundles. The 2016 sepsis consensus definitions include lactate concentrations >2mmol/L (>18mg/dL) as part of the definition of septic shock. Also included in the 2016 definitions are measuring bilirubin and creatinine to determine progression of organ failure indicating worse prognosis. Hematologic parameters, including a simple white blood cell count and differential, are frequently part of the initial sepsis diagnostic protocols. Several new biomarkers have been proposed to diagnose sepsis or to predict mortality, but they currently lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be considered as stand-alone testing. If sepsis is suspected, new technologies and microbiologic assays allow rapid and specific identification of pathogens. In 2016 there is no single laboratory test that accurately diagnoses sepsis.

Indexed as

BiomarkersClinical Laboratory TechniquesHumansSensitivity and SpecificitySepsisBiomarkersBacteremiaBiomarkersBloodstream infectionsCytokinesD-dimerIL-6LactateProcalcitoninRapid diagnosticsSepsis

Identifiers

PMID27387712
PMCPMC4980259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.