ArticleBMC cancer2016
Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Studies of parenchymal texture added to mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review of the methods used in the literature.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2022Pooled it
- Clinical Significance of Combined Density and Deep-Learning-Based Texture Analysis for Stratifying the Risk of Short-Term and Long-Term Breast Cancer in Screening.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Mammographic features and risk of breast cancer death among women with invasive screen-detected cancer in BreastScreen Norway 1996-2020.European radiology · 2024Article
- Causal relationships between breast cancer risk factors based on mammographic features.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2023Article
- Prediction of breast cancer risk by automated volumetric breast density measurement.Japanese journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Microcalcifications, mammographic breast density, and risk of breast cancer: a cohort study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2022Article
- Identify Breast Cancer Risk Factors Using the Gail Assessment Model in Iraq.Archives of Razi Institute · 2022Article
- Radiomics in photon-counting dedicated breast CT: potential of texture analysis for breast density classification.European radiology experimental · 2022Article
- The current status of risk-stratified breast screening.British journal of cancer · 2022Review
- Automated percent mammographic density, mammographic texture variation, and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study.NPJ breast cancer · 2021Article
- The Positive Predictive Values of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 Lesions and its Mammographic Morphological Features.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives.Radiology · 2019Review
- Investigating the feasibility of stratified breast cancer screening using a masking risk predictor.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2019Article
- Assessing the performance of genome-wide association studies for predicting disease risk.PloS one · 2019Article
- Using Convolutional Neural Networks for Enhanced Capture of Breast Parenchymal Complexity Patterns Associated with Breast Cancer Risk.Academic radiology · 2018Article
- The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2018Article
- Using automated texture features to determine the probability for masking of a tumor on mammography, but not ultrasound.European journal of medical research · 2017Observational
- Combining quantitative and qualitative breast density measures to assess breast cancer risk.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2017Article
- Breast Ultrasound Texture Features of Family History of Breast Cancer and Contraceptive Use in Nigerian Younger Women.Journal of medical ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMammographic density is a well-established risk factor for breast cancer. We investigated the association between three different methods of measuring density or parenchymal pattern/texture on digitized film-based mammograms, and examined to what extent textural features independently and jointly with density can improve the ability to identify screening women at increased risk of breast cancer.
methodsThe study included 121 cases and 259 age- and time matched controls based on a cohort of 14,736 women with negative screening mammograms from a population-based screening programme in Denmark in 2007 (followed until 31 December 2010). Mammograms were assessed using the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density classification, Tabár's classification on parenchymal patterns and a fully automated texture quantification technique. The individual and combined association with breast cancer was estimated using binary logistic regression to calculate Odds Ratios (ORs) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs).
resultsCases showed significantly higher BI-RADS and texture scores on average than controls (p < 0.001). All three methods were individually able to segregate women into different risk groups showing significant ORs for BI-RADS D3 and D4 (OR: 2.37; 1.32-4.25 and 3.93; 1.88-8.20), Tabár's PIII and PIV (OR: 3.23; 1.20-8.75 and 4.40; 2.31-8.38), and the highest quartile of the texture score (3.04; 1.63-5.67). AUCs for BI-RADS, Tabár and the texture scores (continuous) were 0.63 (0.57-0-69), 0.65 (0.59-0-71) and 0.63 (0.57-0-69), respectively. Combining two or more methods increased model fit in all combinations, demonstrating the highest AUC of 0.69 (0.63-0.74) when all three methods were combined (a significant increase from standard BI-RADS alone).
conclusionOur findings suggest that the (relative) amount of fibroglandular tissue (density) and mammographic structural features (texture/parenchymal pattern) jointly can improve risk segregation of screening women, using information already available from normal screening routine, in respect to future personalized screening strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.