Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27387439›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

In vitro topological loading of bacterial condensin MukB on DNA, preferentially single-stranded DNA rather than double-stranded DNA.

Hironori Niki, Koichi Yano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. SMC complexes: Lifting the lid on loop extrusion.Current opinion in cell biology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. MukB-mediated Catenation of DNA Is ATP and MukEF Independent.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hironori NikiMicrobial Genetics Laboratory, Genetic Strains Research Center, National Institute of Genetics, 1111, Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka, 411-8540 Japan.
Koichi YanoMicrobial Genetics Laboratory, Genetic Strains Research Center, National Institute of Genetics, 1111, Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka, 411-8540 Japan.
National Institute of Genetics · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Condensin is the major driving force in the segregation of daughter chromosomes in prokaryotes. Core subunits of condensin belong to the SMC protein family, whose members are characterized by a unique ATPase activity and dimers with a V-shaped structure. The V-shaped dimers might close between head domains, forming a ring structure that can encircle DNA. Indeed, cohesin, which is a subfamily of SMC proteins, encircles double-stranded DNA to hold sister chromatids in eukaryotes. However, the question of whether or not condensin encircles the chromosomal DNA remains highly controversial. Here we report that MukB binds topologically to DNA in vitro, and this binding is preferentially single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) rather than double-stranded DNA. The binding of MukB to ssDNA does not require ATP. In fact, thermal energy enhances the binding. The non-SMC subunits MukF and MukE did stimulate the topological binding of MukB, although they hindered DNA-binding of MukB. Recent reports on the distribution of condensin in genomes reveal that actively transcribed genes in yeast and humans are enriched in condensin. In consideration of all these results, we propose that the binding specificity of condensin to chromosome is provided not by the DNA sequence but by the DNA structure, which is ssDNA.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphateChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA, BacterialDNA, Single-StrandedEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsModels, MolecularProtein BindingRepressor ProteinsAdenosine TriphosphateChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA, BacterialDNA, Single-StrandedEscherichia coli ProteinsMukB protein, E colimukE protein, E colimukF protein, E coliRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27387439
PMCPMC4937444
OpenAlexW2474097080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.