SynthesisBMC medical informatics and decision making2016
Diagnostic accuracy of administrative data algorithms in the diagnosis of osteoarthritis: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Accuracy of Diagnostic Codes and Algorithms Used to Identify Rheumatoid Arthritis and Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in Administrative Claims and Electronic Health Records: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Arthritis care & research · 2026Pooled it
- Validity of Algorithms for Identification of Individuals Suffering from Chronic Noncancer Pain in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2020Pooled it
- Association of Diagnostic Code Priority With Identification of True Cardiac Arrest in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Article
- Validation of Diagnostic Code Definitions for Identifying Patient in Korean Health Insurance Claims Data: A Scoping Review.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- Population-Based Big Data Analysis on Disease Patterns in Patients Identified With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Using National Claims Data.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- Treatment Access among Younger Medicaid Beneficiaries with Multiple Myeloma.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2025Article
- Patterns of Comorbidities and Prescribing and Dispensing of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) Among Patients with Osteoarthritis in the USA: Real-World Study.Drugs & aging · 2024Article
- Increased risk of osteoarthritis in patients with atopic disease.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2023Article
- The Association of Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference with the Risk of Achilles Tendon Problems: A Nationwide Population-Based Longitudinal Cohort Study.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2023Article
- Medication use and comorbidities in an increasingly younger osteoarthritis population: an 18-year retrospective open-cohort study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Prescription Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and Incidence of Depression Among Older Cancer Survivors With Osteoarthritis: A Machine Learning Analysis.Cancer informatics · 2023Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of linked administrative data for dementia diagnosis in community-dwelling older men in Australia.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- Validation of Operational Definition to Identify Patients with Osteoporotic Hip Fractures in Administrative Claims Data.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Operational Definition Identifying Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in the Claims Database.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022Article
- Incidence and Prevalence of Knee Osteoarthritis Using Codified and Narrative Data From Electronic Health Records: A Population-Based Study.Arthritis care & research · 2022Article
- Use of diagnostic likelihood ratio of outcome to evaluate misclassification bias in the planning of database studies.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Trends in the Annual Consultation Incidence and Prevalence of Low Back Pain and Osteoarthritis in England from 2000 to 2019: Comparative Estimates from Two Clinical Practice Databases.Clinical epidemiology · 2022Article
- Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing knee cartilage changes over time in patients with osteoarthritis: A systematic review.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2022Review
- Distinct care trajectories among persons living with arthritic conditions: A two-year state sequence analysis.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Predictors of Co-occurring Cardiovascular and Gastrointestinal Disorders among Elderly with Osteoarthritis.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdministrative health care data are frequently used to study disease burden and treatment outcomes in many conditions including osteoarthritis (OA). OA is a chronic condition with significant disease burden affecting over 27 million adults in the US. There are few studies examining the performance of administrative data algorithms to diagnose OA. The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review of administrative data algorithms for OA diagnosis; and, to evaluate the diagnostic characteristics of algorithms based on restrictiveness and reference standards.
methodsTwo reviewers independently screened English-language articles published in Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases that used administrative data to identify OA cases. Each algorithm was classified as restrictive or less restrictive based on number and type of administrative codes required to satisfy the case definition. We recorded sensitivity and specificity of algorithms and calculated positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and positive predictive value (PPV) based on assumed OA prevalence of 0.1, 0.25, and 0.50.
resultsThe search identified 7 studies that used 13 algorithms. Of these 13 algorithms, 5 were classified as restrictive and 8 as less restrictive. Restrictive algorithms had lower median sensitivity and higher median specificity compared to less restrictive algorithms when reference standards were self-report and American college of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. The algorithms compared to reference standard of physician diagnosis had higher sensitivity and specificity than those compared to self-reported diagnosis or ACR criteria.
conclusionsRestrictive algorithms are more specific for OA diagnosis and can be used to identify cases when false positives have higher costs e.g. interventional studies. Less restrictive algorithms are more sensitive and suited for studies that attempt to identify all cases e.g. screening programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.