Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27387131›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of hematology2016

A phase II study of two dose levels of ofatumumab induction followed by maintenance therapy in symptomatic, previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Ian W Flinn, Amy S Ruppert, William Harwin, David Waterhouse, Steven Papish, Jeffrey A Jones, John Hainsworth, John C Byrd

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of hematology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Maintenance therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Frontline Therapy of CLL: Evolving Treatment Paradigm.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2018
    Review
  4. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies: reviewing a revolution.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Current Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Current treatment options in oncology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ian W FlinnSarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee.
Amy S RuppertDivision of Hematology and Comprehensive Cancer Center at the Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
William HarwinSarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee.
David WaterhouseSarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee.
Steven PapishHematology-Oncology Associates of Northern NJ, Morristown, New Jersey.
Jeffrey A JonesDivision of Hematology and Comprehensive Cancer Center at the Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
John HainsworthSarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee.
John C ByrdDivision of Hematology and Comprehensive Cancer Center at the Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. john.byrd@osumc.edu.
Sarah Cannon · USThe Ohio State University · USHematology Oncology Associates · USOncology Hematology Care · US

Funding

TWO SIGNAL REQUIREMENT FOR NATURAL KILLER IMMUNITYP01CA095426 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CALIGIURI, MICHAEL A · 2002 to 2016
$29.6M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA095426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the recent advances in treatment of CLL with targeted agents such as ibrutinib, availability of nonchemotherapy based therapies is desired. Given the 58% response rate (1996 NCI-WG criteria) of single agent ofatumumab in CLL refractory to fludarabine and alemtuzumab, we initiated a phase II trial examining response, safety, and progression-free survival (PFS) of ofatumumab as front-line monotherapy. Patients enrolled included untreated, symptomatic CLL patients over the age of 65 or those who were inappropriate/did not desire chemotherapy. Two cohorts were enrolled sequentially examining either 1 g (33 patients) or 2 g (44 patients) weekly for 8 weeks followed by maintenance dosing every 2 months for a total of 24 months. Patients receiving 1 g were older than those receiving 2 g, but there were no significant differences in other clinical characteristics. The best overall response rates in the 1 and 2 g patient cohorts were 72 and 89% (1996 NCI-WG criteria), respectively (54 and 68%, respectively, using 2008 IWCLL criteria). All but two responses were partial. The 24-month estimated PFS rates were 46 and 78%, respectively. Response and PFS was lower in del(17p) and del(11q) CLL patients. Differences in PFS between dose cohorts were statistically significant and remained so when adjusting for age or high-risk cytogenetics. Toxicity of this treatment was mild with only six patients not completing therapy due to toxicity. Ofatumumab induction followed by maintenance therapy in untreated CLL represents a well-tolerated and active regimen, particularly with the 2 g of ofatumumab. Am. J. Hematol. 91:1020-1025, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCytogeneticsDisease-Free SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInduction ChemotherapyLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMaintenance ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedRemission InductionAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedofatumumab

Identifiers

PMID27387131
PMCPMC5500306
OpenAlexW2465824739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.