Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27386554›Full record

ArticleScience advances2016

Encapsulation-free controlled release: Electrostatic adsorption eliminates the need for protein encapsulation in PLGA nanoparticles.

Malgosia M Pakulska, Irja Elliott Donaghue, Jaclyn M Obermeyer, Anup Tuladhar, Christopher K McLaughlin, Tyler N Shendruk, Molly S Shoichet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Gene editing using gamma modified PNA: HBB gene as a model.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Immunotherapies for locally aggressive cancers.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Malgosia M PakulskaDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E5, Canada.; Institute for Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G9, Canada.
Irja Elliott DonaghueDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E5, Canada.; Institute for Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0064-7141
Jaclyn M ObermeyerDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E5, Canada.; Institute for Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4112-5662
Anup TuladharInstitute for Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3942-2732
Christopher K McLaughlinDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E5, Canada.
Tyler N ShendrukThe Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3NP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7671-2184
Molly S ShoichetDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E5, Canada.; Institute for Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G9, Canada.; Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Encapsulation of therapeutic molecules within polymer particles is a well-established method for achieving controlled release, yet challenges such as low loading, poor encapsulation efficiency, and loss of protein activity limit clinical translation. Despite this, the paradigm for the use of polymer particles in drug delivery has remained essentially unchanged for several decades. By taking advantage of the adsorption of protein therapeutics to poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles, we demonstrate controlled release without encapsulation. In fact, we obtain identical, burst-free, extended-release profiles for three different protein therapeutics with and without encapsulation in PLGA nanoparticles embedded within a hydrogel. Using both positively and negatively charged proteins, we show that short-range electrostatic interactions between the proteins and the PLGA nanoparticles are the underlying mechanism for controlled release. Moreover, we demonstrate tunable release by modifying nanoparticle concentration, nanoparticle size, or environmental pH. These new insights obviate the need for encapsulation and offer promising, translatable strategies for a more effective delivery of therapeutic biomolecules.

Indexed as

Delayed-Action PreparationsDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsLactic AcidNanoparticlesPolyglycolic AcidAdsorptionBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorDrug CompoundingDrug LiberationHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMonte Carlo MethodPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerProteinsStatic ElectricityBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug CarriersLactic AcidPolyglycolic AcidPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerProteinsaffinity releasecentral nervous systemcontrolled releasedrug deliveryhydrogelPLGAprotein

Identifiers

PMID27386554
PMCPMC4928928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.