Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27386435›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular and cellular medicine2016

The Genotoxic and Cytotoxic Effects of Bisphenol-A (BPA) in MCF-7 Cell Line and Amniocytes.

Seyed Mohsen Aghajanpour-Mir, Ebrahim Zabihi, Haleh Akhavan-Niaki, Elahe Keyhani, Iman Bagherizadeh, Sajjad Biglari, Farkhondeh Behjati

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular and cellular medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of BPZ, BPC, BPF, and BPS Exposure on Adult Zebrafish (International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Global DNA Hypomethylation andTurkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seyed Mohsen Aghajanpour-MirCellular & Molecular Biology Research Center, Health Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.; Genetics Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ebrahim ZabihiCellular & Molecular Biology Research Center, Health Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Haleh Akhavan-NiakiCellular & Molecular Biology Research Center, Health Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Elahe KeyhaniGenetics Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iman BagherizadehDepartment of Medical Genetics and Sarem Cell Research Center (SCRC), Sarem Women's Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Sajjad BiglariGenetics Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farkhondeh BehjatiGenetics Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.; Department of Medical Genetics and Sarem Cell Research Center (SCRC), Sarem Women's Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Babol University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bisphenol-A (BPA) is an industrial xenoestrogen used widely in our living environment. Recently, several studies suggested that BPA has destructive effects on DNA and chromosomes in normal body cells via estrogen receptors (ER). Therefore, BPA could be considered as an important mediator in many diseases such as cancer. However, there are still many controversial issues which need clarification. In this study, we investigated the BPA-induced chromosomal damages in MCF-7 cell line, ER-positive and negative amniocyte cells. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity effects of BPA were also compared between these three cell groups. Expression of estrogen receptors was determined using immunocytochemistry technique. The cell cytotoxicity of BPA was measured by MTT assay. Classic cytogenetic technique was carried out for the investigation of chromosome damage. BPA, in addition to cytotoxicity, had remarkable genotoxicity at concentrations close to the traceable levels in tissues or biological fluids. Although some differences were observed in the amount of damages between ER-positive and negative fetal cells, interestingly, these differences were not significant. The present study showed that BPA could lead to chromosomal aberrations in both ER-dependent and independent pathways at some concentrations or in cell types yet not reported. Also, BPA could probably be considered as a facilitator for some predisposed cells to be cancerous by raising the chromosome instability levels. Finally, estrogen receptor seems to have a different role in cytotoxicity and genotoxicity effects.

Indexed as

amniocyteBisphenol-A (BPA)chromosome abnormalityclassic cytogeneticsestrogen receptorMCF-7

Identifiers

PMID27386435
PMCPMC4916780
OpenAlexW2327863410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.