Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27386327›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2016

Re-irradiation of recurrent pediatric ependymoma: modalities and outcomes: a twenty-year survey.

Maria Jesus Lobón, Francisco Bautista, François Riet, Frederic Dhermain, Sandra Canale, Christelle Dufour, Thomas Blauwblomme, Michel Zerah, Kevin Beccaria, Christian Saint-Rose and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. National multicentered retrospective review of salvage therapy for pediatric medulloblastoma: a Canadian experience.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Supratentorial and Infratentorial Ependymoma.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Role of Radiotherapy in Patients With Relapsed Medulloblastoma.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Central nervous system ependymoma: clinical implications of the new molecular classification, treatment guidelines and controversial issues.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pediatric glossopharyngeal neuralgia: a comprehensive review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2019
    Review
  19. Case-based review: ependymomas in adults.Neuro-oncology practice · 2018
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Maria Jesus LobónDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France.
Francisco BautistaDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France.
François RietDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Villejuif, France.
Frederic DhermainDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Villejuif, France.
Sandra CanaleDepartment of Radiology Gustave Roussy, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Villejuif, France.
Christelle DufourDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France.
Thomas BlauwblommeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France.
Michel ZerahDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France.
Kevin BeccariaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France.
Christian Saint-RoseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France.
Stephanie PugetDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France.
Christian CarrieDepartment of Radiotherapy, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Eric LartigauCentre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Pierre-Yves BondiauCentre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Dominique Valteau-CouanetDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France.
Jacques GrillDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France.
Stephanie BolleDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Villejuif, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandard treatment for recurrent ependymomas is not defined. Re- irradiation has been proposed but its modalities and results are still to be explored. PATIENTS AND

methodsFrom June 1994 to December 2013, 32 pediatric patients with ependymoma were re-irradiated for local (n = 15) or metastatic (n = 17) relapses. Files were reviewed retrospectively.

resultsLocal relapses were treated with hypofractionated focal radiotherapy (hypoFFRT) (n = 8) or focal fractionated radiotherapy (FFRT) (n = 7). Metastatic relapses were treated with hypoFFRT (n = 3), FFRT (n = 3), spinal radiotherapy (n = 4) and craniospinal irradiation (CSI) (n = 7). Median PFS and OS after re-irradiation were 1.2 and 3.5 years respectively with a median follow-up of 2.1 years (0.2-11.4). For local relapses, median PFS was 2.5 years for patients treated with hypoFFRT versus 1.2 years for patients treated with FFRT (p = 0.2). For metastatic relapses, median PFS was 0.7 years for patients treated with focal radiotherapy (hypoFFRT, FFRT, spinal radiotherapy) versus 6.8 years for patients treated with CSI (p = 0.073). 15 patients achieved greater PFS after second radiotherapy (RT2) than after first radiotherapy (RT1). 27 patients (84 %) had surgery before re-irradiation. PFS was better for patients with GTR before RT2 (14.7 vs 6.7 months) (p = 0.05). 5 patients developed radionecrosis; only one required corticosteroids.

conclusionRe-irradiation at relapse is a safe, feasible and potentially curative treatment. Metastatic relapse may require CSI even when isolated and re-operated. For local relapses, considering conflicting results in the literature, a randomized trial is warranted to explore fractionated focal radiotherapy versus hypofractionated focal irradiation.

Indexed as

ChildrenEpendymomaRadiosurgeryRadiotherapyRecurrent

Identifiers

PMID27386327
PMCPMC4920736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.