Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27386079›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2016

Plant-fungus competition for nitrogen erases mycorrhizal growth benefits of Andropogon gerardii under limited nitrogen supply.

David Püschel, Martina Janoušková, Martina Hujslová, Renata Slavíková, Hana Gryndlerová, Jan Jansa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
26.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David PüschelLaboratory of Fungal Biology Institute of Microbiology Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic; Department of Mycorrhizal Symbioses Institute of Botany Czech Academy of Sciences Průhonice Czech Republic.
Martina JanouškováLaboratory of Fungal Biology Institute of Microbiology Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic; Department of Mycorrhizal Symbioses Institute of Botany Czech Academy of Sciences Průhonice Czech Republic.
Martina HujslováLaboratory of Fungal Biology Institute of Microbiology Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic.
Renata SlavíkováLaboratory of Fungal Biology Institute of Microbiology Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic.
Hana GryndlerováLaboratory of Fungal Biology Institute of Microbiology Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic.
Jan JansaLaboratory of Fungal Biology Institute of Microbiology Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic.
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · CZInstitute of Microbiology · BY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considered to play an important role in plant mineral nutrition, arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis is a common relationship between the roots of a great majority of plant species and glomeromycotan fungi. Its effects on the plant host are highly context dependent, with the greatest benefits often observed in phosphorus (P)-limited environments. Mycorrhizal contribution to plant nitrogen (N) nutrition is probably less important under most conditions. Moreover, inasmuch as both plant and fungi require substantial quantities of N for their growth, competition for N could potentially reduce net mycorrhizal benefits to the plant under conditions of limited N supply. Further compounded by increased belowground carbon (C) drain, the mycorrhizal costs could outweigh the benefits under severe N limitation. Using a field AM fungal community or a laboratory culture of Rhizophagus irregularis as mycorrhizal inoculants, we tested the contribution of mycorrhizal symbiosis to the growth, C allocation, and mineral nutrition of Andropogon gerardii growing in a nutrient-poor substrate under variable N and P supplies. The plants unambiguously competed with the fungi for N when its supply was low, resulting in no or negative mycorrhizal growth and N-uptake responses under such conditions. The field AM fungal communities manifested their potential to improve plant P nutrition only upon N fertilization, whereas the R. irregularis slightly yet significantly increased P uptake of its plant host (but not the host's growth) even without N supply. Coincident with increasing levels of root colonization by the AM fungal structures, both inoculants invariably increased nutritional and growth benefits to the host with increasing N supply. This, in turn, resulted in relieving plant P deficiency, which was persistent in non-mycorrhizal plants across the entire range of nutrient supplies.

Indexed as

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungibelowground carbon draininoculationmycorrhizal benefits and costsnutrient uptake responseshoot nitrogen‐to‐phosphorus ratio

Identifiers

PMID27386079
PMCPMC4930984
OpenAlexW2438203812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.