Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27385914›Full record

ArticleNutrition and metabolic insights2015

The Effects of the UK Pregnancies Better Eating and Activity Trial Intervention on Dietary Patterns in Obese Pregnant Women Participating in a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Angela C Flynn, Caroline Schneeberger, Paul T Seed, Suzanne Barr, Lucilla Poston, Louise M Goff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition and metabolic insights, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Angela C FlynnDivision of Women's Health, King's College London, School of Medicine, London, UK.; Division of Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, School of Medicine, London, UK.
Caroline SchneebergerDivision of Women's Health, King's College London, School of Medicine, London, UK.
Paul T SeedDivision of Women's Health, King's College London, School of Medicine, London, UK.
Suzanne BarrDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Lucilla PostonDivision of Women's Health, King's College London, School of Medicine, London, UK.
Louise M GoffDivision of Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, School of Medicine, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBKing's College London · GBKing's College School · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10452Medical Research Council MR/L002477/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study is to investigate the effects of the UK Pregnancies Better Eating and Activity Trial (UPBEAT) behavioral intervention on dietary patterns in obese pregnant women.

methodsDietary patterns were derived from Food Frequency Questionnaires using principal component analysis in 183 UPBEAT pilot study participants.

resultsTwo unhealthy dietary patterns, processed and traditional, predominantly characterized by foods high in sugar and fat, improved [processed -0.54 (-0.92 to -0.16), P = 0.006 and traditional -0.83 (-1.20 to -0.45), P < 0.001] following the intervention, while a cultural pattern that was found to be associated with the Black African/Caribbean participants did not change [-0.10 (-0.46 to 0.26), P = 0.589].

conclusionUnhealthy dietary patterns are evident in obese pregnant women. The UPBEAT intervention was effective in improving maternal dietary patterns; however, obese pregnant women from minority ethnic groups may be less receptive to intervention.

Indexed as

dietglycemic indexlifestyleobesitypregnancysaturated fat

Identifiers

PMID27385914
PMCPMC4924882
OpenAlexW2475251159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.