ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016
Presaccadic motion integration between current and future retinotopic locations of attended objects.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal predictability of saccades modulates postsaccadic feature interference.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- The influence of saccade target status on the reference frame of object-location binding.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2025Article
- The spatial properties of adaptation-induced distance compression.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Article
- Post-saccadic changes disrupt attended pre-saccadic object memory.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Transsaccadic integration of visual information is predictive, attention-based, and spatially precise.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Predictive remapping leaves a behaviorally measurable attentional trace on eye-centered brain maps.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021Article
- Stimulus blanking reveals contrast-dependent transsaccadic feature transfer.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Eye movements shape visual learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Transsaccadic integration benefits are not limited to the saccade target.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- Remapping locations and features across saccades: a dual-spotlight theory of attentional updating.Current opinion in psychology · 2019Review
- The Limits of Predictive Remapping of Attention Across Eye Movements.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Article
- Perceptual learning while preparing saccades.Vision research · 2018Article
- Attention modulates trans-saccadic integration.Vision research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Object tracking across eye movements is thought to rely on presaccadic updating of attention between the object's current and its "remapped" location (i.e., the postsaccadic retinotopic location). We report evidence for a bifocal, presaccadic sampling between these two positions. While preparing a saccade, participants viewed four spatially separated random dot kinematograms, one of which was cued by a colored flash. They reported the direction of a coherent motion signal at the cued location while a second signal occurred simultaneously either at the cue's remapped location or at one of several control locations. Motion integration between the signals occurred only when the two motion signals were congruent and were shown at the cue and at its remapped location. This shows that the visual system integrates features between both the current and the future retinotopic locations of an attended object and that such presaccadic sampling is feature specific.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.