ArticleNeurology2016
Value of patient-reported symptoms in the diagnosis of transient loss of consciousness.
Article in Neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Seizures as the first clinical manifestation of acute pulmonary embolism: an underestimate issue in neurocritical care.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- Quantifying the impact of a computer-aided diagnostic score on the clinical diagnosis of functional seizures.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Can artificial intelligence diagnose seizures based on patients' descriptions? A study of GPT-4.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- Supervised machine learning compared to large language models for identifying functional seizures from medical records.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- Validation of a Machine-Learning Clinical Decision Aid for the Differential Diagnosis of Transient Loss of Consciousness.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2025Article
- Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Applications to Epilepsy: a Review for the Practicing Epileptologist.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023Review
- Why functional neurological disorder is not feigning or malingering.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2023Review
- Clinical Functional Seizure Score (CFSS): a simple algorithm for clinicians to suspect functional seizures.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Article
- The hermeneutics of symptoms.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2022Article
- Can Assessment of the Tongue on Brain MRI Aid Differentiation of Seizure from Alternative Causes of Transient Loss of Consciousness?AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2021Article
- Use of suggestive seizure manipulation methods in the investigation of patients with possible psychogenic nonepileptic seizures-An international ILAE survey.Epilepsia open · 2021Article
- The Longer the Block, the Harder You Fall: Extrinsic Idiopathic Atrioventricular Block Masquerading as Seizures.JACC. Case reports · 2021Article
- Reliability of additional reported seizure manifestations to identify dissociative seizures.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2021Article
- Cautionary notes on diagnosing functional neurologic disorder as a neurologist-in-training.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2020Article
- Driving a motor vehicle and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: ILAE Report by the Task Force on Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures.Epilepsia open · 2020Article
- Machine learning as a diagnostic decision aid for patients with transient loss of consciousness.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2020Article
- Reliability of reported peri-ictal behavior to identify psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.Seizure · 2019Article
- Seizures and epilepsy in the acute medical setting: presentation and management.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEpileptic seizures, syncope, and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) account for over 90% of presentations with transient loss of consciousness (TLOC). The patient's history is crucial for the diagnosis, but the diagnostic value of individual semiologic features is limited. This study explores the diagnostic potential of a comprehensive questionnaire focusing on TLOC-associated symptoms.
methodsA total of 386 patients with proven epilepsy, 308 patients with proven PNES, and 371 patients with proven syncope were approached by post to recruit 100 patients in each diagnostic group. Symptoms were self-reported on an 86-item questionnaire (the Paroxysmal Event Profile [PEP]) using a 5-point Likert scale (always to never). Data were subjected to exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Factors were used to differentiate between diagnoses by pairwise and multinomial regression.
resultsPatients with PNES reported more and more frequent TLOC-associated symptoms than those with epilepsy or syncope (p < 0.001). EFA/CFA identified a 5-factor structure based on 74/86 questionnaire items with loadings ≥0.4. Pairwise logistic regression analysis correctly classified 91% of patients with epilepsy vs those with syncope, 94% of those with PNES vs those with syncope, and 77% of those with epilepsy vs those with PNES. Multinomial logistic regression analysis yielded a similar pattern.
conclusionsClusters of self-reported TLOC symptoms can be used to direct patients to appropriate investigation and treatment pathways for syncope on the one hand and seizures on the other, although additional information is required for a reliable distinction, especially between epilepsy and PNES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.