Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27385687›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume2016

Tissue Engineering in Orthopaedics.

Alexander M Tatara, Antonios G Mikos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Silk Fibroin as a Functional Biomaterial for Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander M TataraDepartments of Bioengineering (A.M.T. and A.G.M.) and Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (A.G.M.), Rice University, Houston, Texas tatara@rice.edu.
Antonios G MikosDepartments of Bioengineering (A.M.T. and A.G.M.) and Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (A.G.M.), Rice University, Houston, Texas mikos@rice.edu.
Rice University · US

Funding

In Situ Hardening Cell-Laden Constructs for Osteochondral Tissue EngineeringR01AR068073 · NIAMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI MIKOS, ANTONIOS G. · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR068073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

➤It is important to carefully select the most appropriate combination of scaffold, signals, and cell types when designing tissue engineering approaches for an orthopaedic pathology.➤Although clinical studies in which the tissue engineering paradigm has been applied in the treatment of orthopaedic diseases are limited in number, examining them can yield important lessons.➤While there is a rapid rate of new discoveries in the basic sciences, substantial regulatory, economic, and clinical issues must be overcome with more consistency to translate a greater number of technologies from the laboratory to the operating room.

Indexed as

Orthopedic ProceduresTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsHumans

Identifiers

PMID27385687
PMCPMC4928040
OpenAlexW2470059859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.