Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27385406›Full record

ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2016

Use of spirometry among chest physicians and primary care physicians in India.

Nitin Vanjare, Sushmeeta Chhowala, Sapna Madas, Rahul Kodgule, Jaideep Gogtay, Sundeep Salvi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Asthma in African children and adolescents: Burden, barriers, and management strategies.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Gold 2023: Highlights for primary care.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2023
    Article
  6. Current Progress of COPD Early Detection: Key Points and Novel Strategies.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Chronic respiratory diseases: a global view.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nitin VanjareChest Research Foundation, Pune, India.
Sushmeeta ChhowalaMedical services, Cipla Ltd., Mumbai, India.
Sapna MadasChest Research Foundation, Pune, India.
Rahul KodguleChest Research Foundation, Pune, India.
Jaideep GogtayMedical services, Cipla Ltd., Mumbai, India.
Sundeep SalviChest Research Foundation, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although spirometry is the gold-standard diagnostic test for obstructive airways diseases, it remains poorly utilised in clinical practice. We aimed to investigate the use of spirometry across India, the change in its usage over a period of time and to understand the reasons for its under-utilisation. Two nationwide surveys were conducted in the years 2005 and 2013, among four groups of doctors: chest physicians (CPs), general physicians (GenPs), general practitioners (GPs) and paediatricians (Ps). A total of 1,000 physicians from each of the four groups were randomly selected from our database in the years 2005 and 2013. These surveys were conducted in 52 cities and towns across 15 states in India. A questionnaire was administered to the physicians, which captured information about their demographic details, type of practice and use of spirometry. The overall response rates of the physicians in 2005 and 2013 were 42.8% and 54.9%, respectively. Spirometry was reported to be used by 55% CPs, 20% GenPs, 10% GPs and 5% Ps in 2005, and this increased by 30.9% among CPs (P value <0.01), 18% among GenPs (P value=0.01), 20% among GPs (P value: not significant) and 224% among Ps (P value <0.01). The reasons for not using spirometry varied between 2005 and 2013. In all, 32.2% of physicians were unaware of which predicted equation they were using. The use of spirometry in India is low, although it seems to have improved over the years. The reasons identified in this study for under-utilisation should be used to address initiatives to improve the use of spirometry in clinical practice.

Indexed as

HumansIndiaPediatriciansPhysicians, Primary CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'Pulmonary MedicineSpirometrySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27385406
PMCPMC4936052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.