Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27385077›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2016

Using Electronic Health Record Data to Measure Care Quality for Individuals with Multiple Chronic Medical Conditions.

Elizabeth A Bayliss, Deanna B McQuillan, Jennifer L Ellis, Matthew L Maciejewski, Chan Zeng, Mary B Barton, Cynthia M Boyd, Martin Fortin, Shari M Ling, Ming Tai-Seale and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Quality Indicators for High-Need Patients: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Multimorbidity.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Association between Continuity of Care and Health-Related Quality of Life.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Elizabeth A BaylissInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado. elizabeth.bayliss@kp.org.
Deanna B McQuillanInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado.
Jennifer L EllisInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado.
Matthew L MaciejewskiHealth Services Research and Development, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Chan ZengInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado.
Mary B BartonNational Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, District of Columbia.
Cynthia M BoydDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Martin FortinDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Shari M LingCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ming Tai-SealePalo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, California.
James D RalstonGroup Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Washington.
Christine S RitchieDepartment of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Donna M ZulmanCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California.

Funding

Measuring quality of care for people with Mulitple Chronic ConditionsR21HS023083 · AHRQ · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BAYLISS, ELIZABETH A · 2014 to 2014
$179k
AHRQ HHS R21 HS023083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo inform the development of a data-driven measure of quality care for individuals with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) derived from an electronic health record (EHR).

designQualitative study using focus groups, interactive webinars, and a modified Delphi process.

settingResearch department within an integrated delivery system.

participantsThe webinars and Delphi process included 17 experts in clinical geriatrics and primary care, health policy, quality assessment, health technology, and health system operations. The focus group included 10 individuals aged 70-87 with three to six chronic conditions selected from a random sample of individuals aged 65 and older with three or more chronic medical conditions. MEASUREMENTS: Through webinars and the focus group, input was solicited on constructs representing high-quality care for individuals with MCCs. A working list was created of potential measures representing these constructs. Using a modified Delphi process, experts rated the importance of each possible measure and the feasibility of implementing each measure using EHR data.

resultsHigh-priority constructs reflected processes rather than outcomes of care. High-priority constructs that were potentially feasible to measure included assessing physical function, depression screening, medication reconciliation, annual influenza vaccination, outreach after hospital admission, and documented advance directives. High-priority constructs that were less feasible to measure included goal setting and shared decision-making, identifying drug-drug interactions, assessing social support, timely communication with patients, and other aspects of good customer service. Lower-priority domains included pain assessment, continuity of care, and overuse of screening or laboratory testing.

conclusionHigh-quality MCC care should be measured using meaningful process measures rather than outcomes. Although some care processes are currently extractable from electronic data, capturing others will require adapting and applying technology to encourage holistic, person-centered care.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareQuality of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseComorbidityDelphi TechniqueFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleQualitative ResearchQuality Improvementelectronic health recordmultimorbidityquality

Identifiers

PMID27385077
PMCPMC8675059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.