Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27384922›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Glycoform-independent prion conversion by highly efficient, cell-based, protein misfolding cyclic amplification.

Mohammed Moudjou, Jérôme Chapuis, Mériem Mekrouti, Fabienne Reine, Laetitia Herzog, Pierre Sibille, Hubert Laude, Didier Vilette, Olivier Andréoletti, Human Rezaei and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Role of prion protein glycosylation in replication of human prions by protein misfolding cyclic amplification.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prion Strains and Transmission Barrier Phenomena.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mohammed MoudjouVIM, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Jérôme ChapuisVIM, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Mériem MekroutiVIM, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Fabienne ReineVIM, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Laetitia HerzogVIM, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Pierre SibilleVIM, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Hubert LaudeVIM, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Didier ViletteVIM, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Olivier AndréolettiIHAP, INRA, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 31000, Toulouse, France.
Human RezaeiVIM, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Michel DronVIM, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Vincent BéringueVIM, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prions are formed of misfolded assemblies (PrP(Sc)) of the variably N-glycosylated cellular prion protein (PrP(C)). In infected species, prions replicate by seeding the conversion and polymerization of host PrP(C). Distinct prion strains can be recognized, exhibiting defined PrP(Sc) biochemical properties such as the glycotype and specific biological traits. While strain information is encoded within the conformation of PrP(Sc) assemblies, the storage of the structural information and the molecular requirements for self-perpetuation remain uncertain. Here, we investigated the specific role of PrP(C) glycosylation status. First, we developed an efficient protein misfolding cyclic amplification method using cells expressing the PrP(C) species of interest as substrate. Applying the technique to PrP(C) glycosylation mutants expressing cells revealed that neither PrP(C) nor PrP(Sc) glycoform stoichiometry was instrumental to PrP(Sc) formation and strainness perpetuation. Our study supports the view that strain properties, including PrP(Sc) glycotype are enciphered within PrP(Sc) structural backbone, not in the attached glycans.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingAnimalsBiochemistryBrainCell ExtractsCell LineCells, CulturedElectrophoresisGene Knockout TechniquesGlycosylationHumansMice, TransgenicMicrospheresMiniaturizationMutant ProteinsPrionsCell ExtractsMutant ProteinsPrions

Identifiers

PMID27384922
PMCPMC4935985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.