Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27384712›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2016

Using Combined Diagnostic Test Results to Hindcast Trends of Infection from Cross-Sectional Data.

Gustaf Rydevik, Giles T Innocent, Glenn Marion, Ross S Davidson, Piran C L White, Charalambos Billinis, Paul Barrow, Peter P C Mertens, Dolores Gavier-Widén, Michael R Hutchings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Estimating epidemiologic dynamics from cross-sectional viral load distributions.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gustaf RydevikBiomathematics and Statistics Scotland (BIOSS), Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Giles T InnocentBiomathematics and Statistics Scotland (BIOSS), Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Glenn MarionBiomathematics and Statistics Scotland (BIOSS), Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ross S DavidsonSRUC, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1468-5867
Piran C L WhiteEnvironment Department, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Charalambos BillinisLaboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Thessaly, Karditsa, Greece.
Paul BarrowSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Peter P C MertensThe Vector-Borne Viral Diseases Programme, The Pirbright Institute, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Dolores Gavier-WidénNational Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Michael R HutchingsSRUC, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious disease surveillance is key to limiting the consequences from infectious pathogens and maintaining animal and public health. Following the detection of a disease outbreak, a response in proportion to the severity of the outbreak is required. It is thus critical to obtain accurate information concerning the origin of the outbreak and its forward trajectory. However, there is often a lack of situational awareness that may lead to over- or under-reaction. There is a widening range of tests available for detecting pathogens, with typically different temporal characteristics, e.g. in terms of when peak test response occurs relative to time of exposure. We have developed a statistical framework that combines response level data from multiple diagnostic tests and is able to 'hindcast' (infer the historical trend of) an infectious disease epidemic. Assuming diagnostic test data from a cross-sectional sample of individuals infected with a pathogen during an outbreak, we use a Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach to estimate time of exposure, and the overall epidemic trend in the population prior to the time of sampling. We evaluate the performance of this statistical framework on simulated data from epidemic trend curves and show that we can recover the parameter values of those trends. We also apply the framework to epidemic trend curves taken from two historical outbreaks: a bluetongue outbreak in cattle, and a whooping cough outbreak in humans. Together, these results show that hindcasting can estimate the time since infection for individuals and provide accurate estimates of epidemic trends, and can be used to distinguish whether an outbreak is increasing or past its peak. We conclude that if temporal characteristics of diagnostics are known, it is possible to recover epidemic trends of both human and animal pathogens from cross-sectional data collected at a single point in time.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAlgorithmsAnimalsBluetongueCattleCattle DiseasesComputational BiologyCross-Sectional StudiesEpidemicsHumansPopulation SurveillanceWhooping Cough

Identifiers

PMID27384712
PMCPMC4934910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.