Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27384421›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2016

Screening of Conditionally Reprogrammed Patient-Derived Carcinoma Cells Identifies ERCC3-MYC Interactions as a Target in Pancreatic Cancer.

Natalya Beglyarova, Eugenia Banina, Yan Zhou, Ramilia Mukhamadeeva, Grigorii Andrianov, Egor Bobrov, Elena Lysenko, Natalya Skobeleva, Linara Gabitova, Diana Restifo and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalya BeglyarovaProgram in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Eugenia BaninaProgram in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Yan ZhouBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ramilia MukhamadeevaDepartment of Biochemistry, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russian Federation.
Grigorii AndrianovDepartment of Biochemistry, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russian Federation.
Egor BobrovProgram in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Elena LysenkoProgram in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Natalya SkobelevaProgram in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Linara GabitovaProgram in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Diana RestifoProgram in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Max PressmanProgram in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ilya G SerebriiskiiProgram in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
John P HoffmanProgram in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Keren PazChampions Oncology, Baltimore, Maryland.
Diana BehrensEPO Experimental Pharmacology and Oncology GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Vladimir KhazakNexus Pharma, Langhorne, Pennsylvania.
Sandra A JablonskiLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Erica A GolemisProgram in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Louis M WeinerLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Igor AstsaturovProgram in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. igor.astsaturov@fccc.edu.
Georgetown University · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
ROLES OF HEF1 IN CELL DIFFERENTIATION AND SURVIVALR01CA063366 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI GOLEMIS, ERICA A. · 1998 to 2013
$3.9M
Synergistic targeting of cholesterol metabolism and EGFR signaling in cancerR01CA188430 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI ASTSATUROV, IGOR · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
Targeting Sterol Gene SC4MOL and EGFR as Synergistic Anti-Cancer StrategyK22CA160725 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI ASTSATUROV, IGOR · 2011 to 2013
$592k
Regulation of EGFR by SC4MOL- and NSDHL-Dependent TraffickingR21CA164205 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI ASTSATUROV, IGOR · 2012 to 2013
$413k
NCI NIH HHS K22 CA160725NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS R01 CA063366NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188430NCI NIH HHS R21 CA164205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEven when diagnosed prior to metastasis, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a devastating malignancy with almost 90% lethality, emphasizing the need for new therapies optimally targeting the tumors of individual patients. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe first developed a panel of new physiologic models for study of PDAC, expanding surgical PDAC tumor samples in culture using short-term culture and conditional reprogramming with the Rho kinase inhibitor Y-27632, and creating matched patient-derived xenografts (PDX). These were evaluated for sensitivity to a large panel of clinical agents, and promising leads further evaluated mechanistically.

resultsOnly a small minority of tested agents was cytotoxic in minimally passaged PDAC cultures in vitro Drugs interfering with protein turnover and transcription were among most cytotoxic. Among transcriptional repressors, triptolide, a covalent inhibitor of ERCC3, was most consistently effective in vitro and in vivo causing prolonged complete regression in multiple PDX models resistant to standard PDAC therapies. Importantly, triptolide showed superior activity in MYC-amplified PDX models and elicited rapid and profound depletion of the oncoprotein MYC, a transcriptional regulator. Expression of ERCC3 and MYC was interdependent in PDACs, and acquired resistance to triptolide depended on elevated ERCC3 and MYC expression. The Cancer Genome Atlas analysis indicates ERCC3 expression predicts poor prognosis, particularly in CDKN2A-null, highly proliferative tumors.

conclusionsThis provides initial preclinical evidence for an essential role of MYC-ERCC3 interactions in PDAC, and suggests a new mechanistic approach for disruption of critical survival signaling in MYC-dependent cancers. Clin Cancer Res; 22(24); 6153-63. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

AmidesAnimalsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell LineCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDiterpenesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesEpoxy CompoundsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHeterograftsHumansMiceMice, SCIDNIH 3T3 CellsAmidesDiterpenesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesEpoxy CompoundsPhenanthrenesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycPyridinesrho-Associated KinasestriptolideXPBC-ERCC-3 proteinY 27632

Identifiers

PMID27384421
PMCPMC5161635
OpenAlexW2466451217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.