Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27384407›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2016

The International Neonatal Consortium: collaborating to advance regulatory science for neonates.

Mark A Turner, Jonathan M Davis, Susan McCune, Ralph Bax, Ronald J Portman, Lynn D Hudson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Antenatal and perinatal factors influencing neonatal blood pressure: a systematic review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Antibiotics needed to treat multidrug-resistant infections in neonates.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022
    Review
  10. The culture of research communication in neonatal intensive care units: key stakeholder perspectives.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Precision therapeutics in the NICU: why are we missing the mark?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The Need for Pediatric Drug Development.The Journal of pediatrics · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark A TurnerInstitute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Jonathan M DavisDepartment of Pediatrics, Floating Hospital for Children, Tufts Medical Center, and Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Susan McCuneOffice of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Ralph BaxPaediatric Medicines, Product Development & Scientific Support Department, European Medicines Agency, London, UK.
Ronald J PortmanPediatric Therapeutic Area, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Lynn D HudsonCritical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona.

Funding

Critical Path to Public Private PartnershipsU18FD005320 · FDA · CRITICAL PATH INSTITUTE · PI Klaus Romero · 2014 to 2026
$127.1M
FDA U18FD005320-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

HumansInfant, NewbornNeonatology

Identifiers

PMID27384407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.