ReviewThe oncologist2016
Deciphering and Targeting Oncogenic Mutations and Pathways in Breast Cancer.
Review in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- LC-MS/MS-based clinical value exploration of the methionine cycle in luminal breast cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Mapping Non-Coding Epimutations in Breast Cancer: Advancing Epigenetics Towards Precision Medicine.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2026Review
- Article
- Emerging role of natural bioactive compounds in navigating the future of liver disease.iLIVER · 2025Review
- Challenges in managing recurrent luminal A breast cancer: a case study.Ecancermedicalscience · 2025Article
- Identification of modules and key genes associated with breast cancer subtypes through network analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Common tumor-suppressive signaling of thyroid hormone receptor beta in breast and thyroid cancer cells.Molecular carcinogenesis · 2021Article
- TP53 mutations are associated with primary endocrine resistance in luminal early breast cancer.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Advances in Analyzing the Breast Cancer Lipidome and Its Relevance to Disease Progression and Treatment.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2021Review
- Liquid Biopsy as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool for Women and Female Dogs with Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2021Article
- Review
- Drug Sensitivity and Drug Repurposing Platform for Cancer Precision Medicine.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Analysis of N6-Methyladenosine Modification Patterns and Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Paired tumor sequencing and germline testing in breast cancer management: An experience of a single academic center.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2020Article
- Breast cancers, mammary stem cells, and cancer stem cells, characteristics, and hypotheses.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Review
- Circulating tumor cells and breast cancer-specific mutations in primary breast cancer.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2020Article
- Mechanisms of tRNA-derived fragments and tRNA halves in cancer treatment resistance.Biomarker research · 2020Review
- Comprehensive Outline of Whole Exome Sequencing Data Analysis Tools Available in Clinical Oncology.Cancers · 2019Review
- Interrogating Mutant Allele Expression via Customized Reference Genomes to Define Influential Cancer Mutations.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelled: Advances in DNA and RNA sequencing revealed substantially greater genomic complexity in breast cancer than simple models of a few driver mutations would suggest. Only very few, recurrent mutations or copy-number variations in cancer-causing genes have been identified. The two most common alterations in breast cancer are TP53 (affecting the majority of triple-negative breast cancers) and PIK3CA (affecting almost half of estrogen receptor-positive cancers) mutations, followed by a long tail of individually rare mutations affecting <1%-20% of cases. Each cancer harbors from a few dozen to a few hundred potentially high-functional impact somatic variants, along with a much larger number of potentially high-functional impact germline variants. It is likely that it is the combined effect of all genomic variations that drives the clinical behavior of a given cancer. Furthermore, entirely new classes of oncogenic events are being discovered in the noncoding areas of the genome and in noncoding RNA species driven by errors in RNA editing. In light of this complexity, it is not unexpected that, with the exception of HER2 amplification, no robust molecular predictors of benefit from targeted therapies have been identified. In this review, we summarize the current genomic portrait of breast cancer, focusing on genetic aberrations that are actively being targeted with investigational drugs. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Next-generation sequencing is now widely available in the clinic, but interpretation of the results is challenging, and its impact on treatment selection is often limited. This work provides an overview of frequently encountered molecular abnormalities in breast cancer and discusses their potential therapeutic implications. This review emphasizes the importance of administering investigational targeted therapies, or off-label use of approved targeted drugs, in the context of a formal clinical trial or registry programs to facilitate learning about the clinical utility of tumor target profiling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.