Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27384237›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2016

Deciphering and Targeting Oncogenic Mutations and Pathways in Breast Cancer.

Libero Santarpia, Giulia Bottai, Catherine M Kelly, Balázs Győrffy, Borbala Székely, Lajos Pusztai

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Drug Sensitivity and Drug Repurposing Platform for Cancer Precision Medicine.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Libero SantarpiaOncology Experimental Therapeutics, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute, Milan, Italy libero.santarpia@humanitasresearch.it liberosantarpia@yahoo.it lajos.pusztai@yale.edu.
Giulia BottaiOncology Experimental Therapeutics, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute, Milan, Italy.
Catherine M KellyMater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Balázs Győrffy2nd Department of Pediatrics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Borbala Székely2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Lajos PusztaiYale Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA libero.santarpia@humanitasresearch.it liberosantarpia@yahoo.it lajos.pusztai@yale.edu.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITSemmelweis University · HUMater Misericordiae University Hospital · IEYale Cancer Center · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelled: Advances in DNA and RNA sequencing revealed substantially greater genomic complexity in breast cancer than simple models of a few driver mutations would suggest. Only very few, recurrent mutations or copy-number variations in cancer-causing genes have been identified. The two most common alterations in breast cancer are TP53 (affecting the majority of triple-negative breast cancers) and PIK3CA (affecting almost half of estrogen receptor-positive cancers) mutations, followed by a long tail of individually rare mutations affecting <1%-20% of cases. Each cancer harbors from a few dozen to a few hundred potentially high-functional impact somatic variants, along with a much larger number of potentially high-functional impact germline variants. It is likely that it is the combined effect of all genomic variations that drives the clinical behavior of a given cancer. Furthermore, entirely new classes of oncogenic events are being discovered in the noncoding areas of the genome and in noncoding RNA species driven by errors in RNA editing. In light of this complexity, it is not unexpected that, with the exception of HER2 amplification, no robust molecular predictors of benefit from targeted therapies have been identified. In this review, we summarize the current genomic portrait of breast cancer, focusing on genetic aberrations that are actively being targeted with investigational drugs. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Next-generation sequencing is now widely available in the clinic, but interpretation of the results is challenging, and its impact on treatment selection is often limited. This work provides an overview of frequently encountered molecular abnormalities in breast cancer and discusses their potential therapeutic implications. This review emphasizes the importance of administering investigational targeted therapies, or off-label use of approved targeted drugs, in the context of a formal clinical trial or registry programs to facilitate learning about the clinical utility of tumor target profiling.

Indexed as

GenomicsBiomarkers, TumorDNA Copy Number VariationsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyMutationTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Biomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Biomarkers of response to therapyBreast cancer molecular subtypesDrug resistanceMutation-genomic landscapeOncogenic signaling pathwaysPotential therapeutic targetsTumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID27384237
PMCPMC5016060
OpenAlexW2460590704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.