ReviewCardiology and therapy2016
Drug-Eluting Balloons in the Treatment of Coronary De Novo Lesions: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Cardiology and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis: An updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in de novo small coronary vessel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus drug-eluting stent for treatment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2018Pooled it
- Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Very Small-Caliber Vessels: Analysis of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent and Other Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2026Observational
- Article
- Drug-coated balloon: an effective alternative to stent strategy in small-vessel coronary artery disease-a meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Wellens' syndrome: incidence, characteristics, and long-term clinical outcomes.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- Feasibility and Safety of Drug-Coated Balloon-Only Angioplasty for De Novo Ostial Lesions of the Left Anterior Descending Artery: Two-Center Retrospective Study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Small vessel coronary artery disease: How small can we go with myocardial revascularization?Cardiology journal · 2021Review
- In-Stent Restenosis and a Drug-Coated Balloon: Insights from a Clinical Therapeutic Strategy on Coronary Artery Diseases.Cardiology research and practice · 2020Review
- Short-term outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention with directional coronary atherectomy followed by drug-coated balloon: a preliminary report.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2019Observational
- Drug-eluting balloons with provisional bail-out or adjunctive stenting inCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2018Article
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Elderly: Are Drug-coated Balloons the Future?Current cardiology reviews · 2018Review
- Comparison of the safety and efficacy of two types of drug-eluting balloons (RESTORE DEB and SeQuentJournal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2018Article
- Article
- Basic Concepts and Clinical Outcomes of Drug-Eluting Balloons for Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease: An Overview.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) have emerged as a new application in percutaneous coronary intervention. DEBs have proven successful in the treatment of in-stent restenosis, but their role in de novo lesions is less clear. This paper provides a review of the current studies where DEBs have been used in coronary de novo lesions, either as part of a DEB-only strategy or in combination with another device, mainly a bare metal stent (BMS). By searching Pubmed and Embase we were able to identify 52 relevant studies, differing in design, intervention, and clinical setting, including patients with small vessel disease, bifurcation lesions, complex long lesions, acute myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, and elderly. In 23 studies, a DEB was combined with a BMS, 25 studies used a DEB-only strategy with only provisional BMS implantation, and four studies combined a DEB with a drug-eluting stent (DES). In the vast majority of studies, DEB in combination with BMS does not seem to improve clinical or angiographic outcome compared with DES, whereas a DEB-only strategy seems promising, especially when predilatation and geographical mismatch are taken into account. A lower risk of recurrent thrombosis with DEB compared with DES is not evident from the current studies. In conclusion, the main indication for DEB seems to be small vessel disease, especially in clinical scenarios in which a contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy exists. The main approach should be a DEB-only strategy with only provisional bailout stenting, which has shown interesting results in different clinical scenarios. In general, larger randomized controlled studies with prolonged follow-up comparing DEB with best in class DES are warranted. Technical developments of DEBs including the use of different drugs might potentially improve the efficacy of such treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.