Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27384042›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2016

Acute LED irradiation does not change the anaerobic capacity and time to exhaustion during a high-intensity running effort: a double-blind, crossover, and placebo-controlled study : Effects of LED irradiation on anaerobic capacity and performance in running.

Elvis De Souza Malta, Rodrigo Araujo Bonetti De Poli, Gabriel Motta Pinheiro Brisola, Fabio Milioni, Willian Eiji Miyagi, Fabiana Andrade Machado, Alessandro Moura Zagatto

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elvis De Souza MaltaPost-Graduate Program in Movement Sciences, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil.
Rodrigo Araujo Bonetti De PoliPost-Graduate Program in Movement Sciences, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil.
Gabriel Motta Pinheiro BrisolaPost-Graduate Program in Movement Sciences, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil.
Fabio MilioniPost-Graduate Program in Movement Sciences, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil.
Willian Eiji MiyagiPost-Graduate Program in Movement Sciences, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil.
Fabiana Andrade MachadoDepartment of Physical Education, State University of Maringá, Avenue Colombo, 5790, 87.020-900, Maringá, PR, Brazil.
Alessandro Moura ZagattoPost-Graduate Program in Movement Sciences, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil. azagatto@yahoo.com.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the acute effects of photobiomodulation therapy using cluster light-emitting diodes (LEDT; 104 diodes) (wavelength 660 and 850 nm; energy density 1.5 and 4.5 J/cm(2); energy 60 J at each point; total energy delivered 600 J) on alternative maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAODALT) and time to exhaustion, during a high-intensity running effort. Fifteen moderately active and healthy males (age 25.1 ± 4.4 years) underwent a graded exercise test and two supramaximal exhaustive efforts at 115 % of the intensity associated with maximal oxygen uptake performed after acute LEDT or placebo irradiation in a double-blind, crossover, and placebo-controlled study design. The MAODALT was assumed as the sum of both oxygen equivalents estimated from the glycolytic and phosphagen metabolism pathways during each supramaximal effort. For the statistical analysis, a paired t test was used to determine differences between the treatments. The significance level was assumed as 95 %. In addition, a qualitative analysis was used to determine the magnitude of differences between groups. No significant differences were found for the values of oxygen equivalents from each energetic metabolism (P ≥ 0.28), for MAODALT values between the LEDT and placebo conditions (P ≥ 0.27), or for time to exhaustion (P = 0.80), except for the respiratory exchange ratio (P = 0.01). The magnitude-based inference of effect size reported only a possibly negative effect of photobiomodulation on MAODALT when expressed in units relative to body mass and on the glycolysis pathway (26 %). In summary, LEDT after a high-intensity running effort did not alter the MAODALT, metabolic energy pathways, or high-intensity running performance.

Indexed as

LasersAdultAnaerobiosisCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodHumansMaleMuscle FatigueOxygen ConsumptionPhysical ExertionPlacebosRunningTime FactorsPlacebosAnaerobic capacityLED therapyMaximal accumulated oxygen deficitPhotobiomodulation therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.