ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2016
Fragment-Based Analysis of Ligand Dockings Improves Classification of Actives.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The AutoDock suite at 30.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021Article
- CANDOCK: Chemical Atomic Network-Based Hierarchical Flexible Docking Algorithm Using Generalized Statistical Potentials.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2020Article
- Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibition of phytocompounds fromJournal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We describe ADChemCast, a method for using results from virtual screening to create a richer representation of a target binding site, which may be used to improve ranking of compounds and characterize the determinants of ligand-receptor specificity. ADChemCast clusters docked conformations of ligands based on shared pairwise receptor-ligand interactions within chemically similar structural fragments, building a set of attributes characteristic of binders and nonbinders. Machine learning is then used to build rules from the most informational attributes for use in reranking of compounds. In this report, we use ADChemCast to improve the ranking of compounds in 11 diverse proteins from the Database of Useful Decoys-Enhanced (DUD-E) and demonstrate the utility of the method for characterizing relevant binding attributes in HIV reverse transcriptase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.