Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27383840›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2016

External radiation dose and cancer mortality among French nuclear workers: considering potential confounding by internal radiation exposure.

L Fournier, O Laurent, E Samson, S Caër-Lorho, P Laroche, B Le Guen, D Laurier, K Leuraud

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

L FournierIonizing Radiation Epidemiology Laboratory, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, 31 Avenue de la Division Leclerc, BP 17, 92262, Fontenay aux Roses Cedex, France. lucie.fournier@irsn.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9414-9249
O LaurentIonizing Radiation Epidemiology Laboratory, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, 31 Avenue de la Division Leclerc, BP 17, 92262, Fontenay aux Roses Cedex, France.
E SamsonIonizing Radiation Epidemiology Laboratory, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, 31 Avenue de la Division Leclerc, BP 17, 92262, Fontenay aux Roses Cedex, France.
S Caër-LorhoIonizing Radiation Epidemiology Laboratory, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, 31 Avenue de la Division Leclerc, BP 17, 92262, Fontenay aux Roses Cedex, France.
P LarocheAREVA, Paris, France.
B Le GuenEDF, Saint Denis, France.
D LaurierIonizing Radiation Epidemiology Laboratory, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, 31 Avenue de la Division Leclerc, BP 17, 92262, Fontenay aux Roses Cedex, France.
K LeuraudIonizing Radiation Epidemiology Laboratory, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, 31 Avenue de la Division Leclerc, BP 17, 92262, Fontenay aux Roses Cedex, France.
Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire · FRÉlectricité de France (France) · FROrano (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFrench nuclear workers have detailed records of their occupational exposure to external radiation that have been used to examine associations with subsequent cancer mortality. However, some workers were also exposed to internal contamination by radionuclides. This study aims to assess the potential for bias due to confounding by internal contamination of estimates of associations between external radiation exposure and cancer mortality.

methodsA cohort of 59,004 workers employed for at least 1 year between 1950 and 1994 by CEA (Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique), AREVA NC, or EDF (Electricité de France) and badge-monitored for external radiation exposure were followed through 2004 to assess vital status and cause of death. A flag based on a workstation-exposure matrix defined four levels of potential for internal contamination. Standardized mortality ratios were assessed for each level of the internal contamination indicator. Poisson regression was used to quantify associations between external radiation exposure and cancer mortality, adjusting for potential internal contamination.

resultsFor solid cancer, the mortality deficit tended to decrease as the levels of potential for internal contamination increased. For solid cancer and leukemia excluding chronic lymphocytic leukemia, adjusting the dose-response analysis on the internal contamination indicator did not markedly change the excess relative risk per Sievert of external radiation dose.

conclusionsThis study suggests that in this cohort, neglecting information on internal dosimetry while studying the association between external dose and cancer mortality does not generate a substantial bias. To investigate more specifically the health effects of internal contamination, an effort is underway to estimate organ doses due to internal contamination.

Indexed as

Nuclear Power PlantsAdultCohort StudiesDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFranceHumansLeukemia, Radiation-InducedMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposurePoisson DistributionRadiation ExposureConfoundingInternal contaminationNuclear workersOccupational epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID27383840
OpenAlexW2461951484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.