Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27383834›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Positive Predictive Value of the WHO Clinical and Immunologic Criteria to Predict Viral Load Failure among Adults on First, or Second-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in Kenya.

Anthony Waruru, Hellen Muttai, Lucy Ng'ang'a, Marta Ackers, Andrea Kim, Fredrick Miruka, Opiyo Erick, Julie Okonji, Tolbert Ayuaya, Sandra Schwarcz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anthony WaruruUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4281-6345
Hellen MuttaiUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Nairobi, Kenya.
Lucy Ng'ang'aUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Nairobi, Kenya.
Marta AckersUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, United States of America.
Andrea KimUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, United States of America.
Fredrick MirukaUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Nairobi, Kenya.
Opiyo ErickKenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Julie OkonjiKenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Tolbert AyuayaKenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Sandra SchwarczSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, United States of America.

Funding

University of California, Berkeley (UCB)/University of *D43TW000003 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI REINGOLD, ARTHUR L · 1988 to 2013
$16.7M
Int'l Traineeships in AIDS Prevention Studies (ITAPS)R25MH064712 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LINDAN, CHRISTINA P · 2002 to 2018
$3.4M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW000003NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH064712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Routine HIV viral load (VL) monitoring is the standard of care for persons receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) in developed countries. Although the World Health Organization recommends annual VL monitoring of patients on ART, recognizing difficulties in conducting routine VL testing, the WHO continues to recommend targeted VL testing to confirm treatment failure for persons who meet selected immunologic and clinical criteria. Studies have measured positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, sensitivity and specificity of these criteria among patients receiving first-line ART but not specifically among those on second-line or subsequent regimens. Between 2008 and 2011, adult ART patients in Nyanza, Kenya who met national clinical or immunologic criteria for treatment failure received targeted VL testing. We calculated PPV and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of these criteria to detect virologic treatment failure among patients receiving a) first-line ART, b) second/subsequent ART, and c) any regimen. Of 12,134 patient specimens tested, 2,874 (23.7%) were virologically confirmed as treatment failures. The PPV for 2,834 first-line ART patients who met either the clinical or immunologic criteria for treatment failure was 34.4% (95% CI 33.2-35.7), 33.1% (95% CI 24.7-42.3) for the 40 patients on second-line/subsequent regimens, and 33.4% (95% CI 33.1-35.6) for any ART. PPV, regardless of criteria, for first-line ART patients was lowest among patients over 44 years old and highest for patients aged 15 to 34 years. PPV of immunological and clinical criteria for correctly identifying treatment failure was similarly low for adult patients receiving either first-line or second-line/subsequent ART regimens. Our data confirm the inadequacy of clinical and immunologic criteria to correctly identify treatment failure and support the implementation of routine VL testing.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansKenyaMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisSensitivity and SpecificityTreatment FailureViral LoadWorld Health OrganizationYoung AdultAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID27383834
PMCPMC4934908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.