Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27383378›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Molecular basis of the remarkable species selectivity of an insecticidal sodium channel toxin from the African spider Augacephalus ezendami.

Volker Herzig, Maria Ikonomopoulou, Jennifer J Smith, Sławomir Dziemborowicz, John Gilchrist, Lucia Kuhn-Nentwig, Fernanda Oliveira Rezende, Luciano Andrade Moreira, Graham M Nicholson, Frank Bosmans and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Isolation of two insecticidal toxins from venom of the Australian theraphosid spider Coremiocnemis tropix.Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Volker HerzigInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Maria IkonomopoulouInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Jennifer J SmithInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Sławomir DziemborowiczSchool of Medical &Molecular Biosciences, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.
John GilchristDepartment of Physiology &Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Lucia Kuhn-NentwigInstitute of Ecology &Evolution, University of Bern, CH 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Fernanda Oliveira RezendeFIOCRUZ/Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, Belo Horizonte, CEP 30190-002, MG, Brazil.
Luciano Andrade MoreiraFIOCRUZ/Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, Belo Horizonte, CEP 30190-002, MG, Brazil.
Graham M NicholsonSchool of Medical &Molecular Biosciences, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.
Frank BosmansDepartment of Physiology &Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Glenn F KingInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
University of Queensland · AUFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUJohns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inexorable decline in the armament of registered chemical insecticides has stimulated research into environmentally-friendly alternatives. Insecticidal spider-venom peptides are promising candidates for bioinsecticide development but it is challenging to find peptides that are specific for targeted pests. In the present study, we isolated an insecticidal peptide (Ae1a) from venom of the African spider Augacephalus ezendami (family Theraphosidae). Injection of Ae1a into sheep blowflies (Lucilia cuprina) induced rapid but reversible paralysis. In striking contrast, Ae1a was lethal to closely related fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) but induced no adverse effects in the recalcitrant lepidopteran pest Helicoverpa armigera. Electrophysiological experiments revealed that Ae1a potently inhibits the voltage-gated sodium channel BgNaV1 from the German cockroach Blattella germanica by shifting the threshold for channel activation to more depolarized potentials. In contrast, Ae1a failed to significantly affect sodium currents in dorsal unpaired median neurons from the American cockroach Periplaneta americana. We show that Ae1a interacts with the domain II voltage sensor and that sensitivity to the toxin is conferred by natural sequence variations in the S1-S2 loop of domain II. The phyletic specificity of Ae1a provides crucial information for development of sodium channel insecticides that target key insect pests without harming beneficial species.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlattellidaeDipteraDrosophila melanogasterDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalInsecticidesInsect ProteinsLepidopteraNAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelPeptidesPeriplanetaRecombinant ProteinsSpidersSpider VenomsVoltage-Gated Sodium Channel BlockersVoltage-Gated Sodium ChannelsInsecticidesInsect ProteinsNAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelPeptidesRecombinant ProteinsSCN5A protein, humanSpider VenomsVoltage-Gated Sodium Channel BlockersVoltage-Gated Sodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID27383378
PMCPMC4935840
OpenAlexW2473490468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.