Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27382596›Full record

ReviewEye and vision (London, England)2016

Consideration of corneal biomechanics in the diagnosis and management of keratoconus: is it important?

FangJun Bao, Brendan Geraghty, QinMei Wang, Ahmed Elsheikh

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye and vision (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effects of caffeine intake on the biomechanical properties of the cornea: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover pilot study in low caffeine consumers.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2020
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Analysis of astigmatism type influence onFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Assessment of the corneal biomechanical features of granular corneal dystrophy type 2 using dynamic ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug imaging.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  19. Patient-specific air puff-induced loading using machine learning.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

FangJun BaoThe Affiliated Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou City, 325027 China ; The Institution of Ocular Biomechanics, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou City, 325027 China.
Brendan GeraghtySchool of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool City, L69 3GH UK.
QinMei WangThe Affiliated Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou City, 325027 China ; The Institution of Ocular Biomechanics, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou City, 325027 China.
Ahmed ElsheikhSchool of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool City, L69 3GH UK ; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London City, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

Department of Health HTD 539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keratoconus is a bilateral, non-inflammatory, degenerative corneal disease. The occurrence and development of keratoconus is associated with corneal thinning and conical protrusion, which causes irregular astigmatism. With the disruption of the collagen organization, the cornea loses its shape and function resulting in progressive visual degradation. Currently, corneal topography is the most important tool for the diagnosis of keratoconus, which may lead to false negatives among the patient population in the subclinical phase. However, it is now hypothesised that biomechanical destabilisation of the cornea may take place ahead of the topographic evidence of keratoconus, hence possibly assisting with disease diagnosis and management. This article provides a review of the definition, diagnosis, and management strategies for keratoconus based on corneal biomechanics.

Indexed as

Corneal biomechanicsCorneal collagen cross-linkingIn vivoKeratoconus

Identifiers

PMID27382596
PMCPMC4932704
OpenAlexW2470314746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.