Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27382466›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2016

Success stories and emerging themes in conservation physiology.

Christine L Madliger, Steven J Cooke, Erica J Crespi, Jennifer L Funk, Kevin R Hultine, Kathleen E Hunt, Jason R Rohr, Brent J Sinclair, Cory D Suski, Craig K R Willis and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Glucocorticoids and land cover: a largescale comparative approach to assess a physiological biomarker for avian conservation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Christine L MadligerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada N9B 3P4.
Steven J CookeFish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1S 5B6.
Erica J CrespiSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
Jennifer L FunkSchmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA.
Kevin R HultineDepartment of Research, Conservation and Collections, Desert Botanical Garden, Phoenix, AZ 85008, USA.
Kathleen E HuntJohn H. Prescott Marine Laboratory, Research Department, New England Aquarium, Boston, MA 02110, USA.
Jason R RohrIntegrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.
Brent J SinclairDepartment of Biology, Western University, London, ON, Canada N6A 5B7.
Cory D SuskiDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Craig K R WillisDepartment of Biology and Centre for Forest Interdisciplinary Research, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3B 2E9.
Oliver P LoveDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada N9B 3P4; Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada N9B 3P4.

Funding

Effects of agricultural expansion and intensification on infectionsR01TW010286 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI REMAIS, JUSTIN V, ROHR, JASON ROBERT · 2015 to 2019
$2.4M
EID disease in complex communities: multi-host multi-pathogen interactionsR01GM109499 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI BRIGGS, CHERYL J · 2013 to 2016
$1.7M
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW010286NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential benefits of physiology for conservation are well established and include greater specificity of management techniques, determination of cause-effect relationships, increased sensitivity of health and disturbance monitoring and greater capacity for predicting future change. While descriptions of the specific avenues in which conservation and physiology can be integrated are readily available and important to the continuing expansion of the discipline of 'conservation physiology', to date there has been no assessment of how the field has specifically contributed to conservation success. However, the goal of conservation physiology is to foster conservation solutions and it is therefore important to assess whether physiological approaches contribute to downstream conservation outcomes and management decisions. Here, we present eight areas of conservation concern, ranging from chemical contamination to invasive species to ecotourism, where physiological approaches have led to beneficial changes in human behaviour, management or policy. We also discuss the shared characteristics of these successes, identifying emerging themes in the discipline. Specifically, we conclude that conservation physiology: (i) goes beyond documenting change to provide solutions; (ii) offers a diversity of physiological metrics beyond glucocorticoids (stress hormones); (iii) includes approaches that are transferable among species, locations and times; (iv) simultaneously allows for human use and benefits to wildlife; and (v) is characterized by successes that can be difficult to find in the primary literature. Overall, we submit that the field of conservation physiology has a strong foundation of achievements characterized by a diversity of conservation issues, taxa, physiological traits, ecosystem types and spatial scales. We hope that these concrete successes will encourage the continued evolution and use of physiological tools within conservation-based research and management plans.

Indexed as

Conservation physiologyecotourisminvasive speciesnutritionsensory ecologytoxicology

Identifiers

PMID27382466
PMCPMC4922248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.