Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27382274›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2016

Point-of-care procalcitonin test to reduce antibiotic exposure in patients hospitalized with acute exacerbation of COPD.

Caspar Corti, Markus Fally, Andreas Fabricius-Bjerre, Katrine Mortensen, Birgitte Nybo Jensen, Helle F Andreassen, Celeste Porsbjerg, Jenny Dahl Knudsen, Jens-Ulrik Jensen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Procalcitonin to guide antibiotic administration in COPD exacerbations: a meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Utility of Procalcitonin in Clinical Practice.Journal of Brown hospital medicine · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Uncertainty as a critical determinant of antibiotic prescribing in patients with an asthma exacerbation: a qualitative study.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Caspar CortiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen.
Markus FallyDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen.
Andreas Fabricius-BjerreDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen.
Katrine MortensenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen.
Birgitte Nybo JensenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen.
Helle F AndreassenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen.
Celeste PorsbjergDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen.
Jenny Dahl KnudsenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Jens-Ulrik JensenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was conducted to investigate whether point-of-care (POC) procalcitonin (PCT) measurement can reduce redundant antibiotic treatment in patients hospitalized with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD).

methodsOne-hundred and twenty adult patients admitted with AECOPD were enrolled in this open-label randomized trial. Patients were allocated to either the POC PCT-guided intervention arm (n=62) or the control arm, in which antibiotic therapy followed local guidelines (n=58).

resultsThe median duration of antibiotic exposure was 3.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 0-10) days in the PCT-arm vs 8.5 (IQR 1-11) days in the control arm (P=0.0169, Wilcoxon) for the intention-to-treat population. The proportion of patients using antibiotics for ≥5 days within the 28-day follow-up was 41.9% (PCT-arm) vs 67.2% (P=0.006, Fisher's exact) in the intention-to-treat population. For the per-protocol population, the proportions were 21.1% (PCT-arm) vs 73.9% (P<0.00001, Fisher's exact). Within 28-day follow-up, one patient died in the PCT-arm and two died in the control arm. A composite harm end point consisting of death, rehospitalization, or intensive care unit admission, all within 28 days, showed no apparent difference.

conclusionOur study shows that the implementation of a POC PCT-guided algorithm can be used to substantially reduce antibiotic exposure in patients hospitalized with AECOPD, with no apparent harm.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingHospitalizationPoint-of-Care SystemsPoint-of-Care TestingAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersCalcitoninDenmarkDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleGuideline AdherenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersCalcitoninantibiotic stewardshipbacterial infectionbiomarker-guidedCOPD exacerbationpoint-of-careprocalcitonin

Identifiers

PMID27382274
PMCPMC4922826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.