Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27382265›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2016

Inappropriate prescribing of antithrombotic therapy in Ethiopian elderly population using updated 2015 STOPP/START criteria: a cross-sectional study.

Henok Getachew, Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula, Tamrat Befekadu Abebe, Sewunet Admasu Belachew

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prescribing Practices in Geriatric Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Henok GetachewDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Akshaya Srikanth BhagavathulaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Tamrat Befekadu AbebeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Sewunet Admasu BelachewDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
University of Gondar · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInappropriate use of antiplatelets and anticoagulants among elderly patients increases the risk of adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing of antithrombotic therapy in hospitalized elderly patients.

methodsA retrospective cross-sectional, single-center study was conducted at the Gondar University Hospital. A total of 156 hospitalized elderly patients fulfilling the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included in the study. The Screening Tool for Older Person's Prescription/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment criteria version 2 were applied to patients' data to identify the total number of inappropriate prescribing (IPs) including potentially inappropriate medications and potential prescribing omissions.

resultsA total of 70 IPs were identified in 156 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 36 (51.4%) were identified as potentially inappropriate medications by the Screening Tool for Older Person's Prescription criteria. The prevalence of IP per patient indicated that 58 of the 156 (37.2%) patients were exposed to at least one IP. Of these, 32 (55.2%) had at least one potentially inappropriate medication and 33 (56.9%) had at least one potential prescribing omission. Patients hospitalized due to venous thromboembolism (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] =29.87, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-708.6), stroke (AOR =7.74, 95% CI, 1.27-47.29), or acute coronary syndrome (AOR =13.48, 95% CI, 1.4-129.1) were less likely to be exposed to an IP. An increase in Charlson comorbidity index score was associated with increased IP exposure (AOR =0.60, 95% CI, 0.39-0.945). IPs were about six times more likely to absent in patients prescribed with antiplatelet only therapy (AOR =6.23, 95% CI, 1.90-20.37) than those receiving any other groups of antithrombotics.

conclusionIPs are less common in elderly patients primarily admitted due to venous thromboembolism, stroke, and acute coronary syndrome, and those elderly patients prescribed with only antiplatelet. Patients with higher Charlson comorbidity index were, however, associated with increased IPs exposure. Our study may guide further research to reduce high-risk prescription of antithrombotics in the elderly.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEthiopiaFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsHospitalizationHumansInappropriate PrescribingLogistic ModelsMaleMultivariate AnalysisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsThrombosisFibrinolytic AgentsantithromboticelderlyEthiopiainappropriate prescribingprevalenceSTOPP/START criteria

Identifiers

PMID27382265
PMCPMC4920226
OpenAlexW2473362255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.