Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27382257›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2016

Fondaparinux vs warfarin for the treatment of unsuspected pulmonary embolism in cancer patients.

Bruno Amato, Rita Compagna, Aldo Rocca, Tommaso Bianco, Marco Milone, Luigi Sivero, Gabriele Vigliotti, Maurizio Amato, Michele Danzi, Giovanni Aprea and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Antithrombotic Effect of Recombinant Neorudin on Thrombi.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bruno AmatoInteruniversity Center of Phlebolymphology, International Research and Educational Program in Clinical and Experimental Biotechnology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, Catanzaro; Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples.
Rita CompagnaInteruniversity Center of Phlebolymphology, International Research and Educational Program in Clinical and Experimental Biotechnology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, Catanzaro; Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples.
Aldo RoccaDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples.
Tommaso BiancoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples.
Marco MiloneDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples.
Luigi SiveroDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples.
Gabriele VigliottiDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples.
Maurizio AmatoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples.
Michele DanziDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples.
Giovanni ApreaDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples.
Luca GallelliDepartment of Health Sciences.
Stefano de FranciscisInteruniversity Center of Phlebolymphology, International Research and Educational Program in Clinical and Experimental Biotechnology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, Catanzaro; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Raffaele SerraInteruniversity Center of Phlebolymphology, International Research and Educational Program in Clinical and Experimental Biotechnology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, Catanzaro; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITMagna Graecia University · ITDepartment of Medical Sciences · BY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn cancer patients, the chest computer tomography (CT) can be used to identify asymptomatic pulmonary embolism (APE). In most cases, these patients are treated with anticoagulant drugs for at least 3 months. The American College of Physicians recommend treatment of these patients as patients with symptomatic pulmonary embolism. In this study, we evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of fondaparinux vs warfarin in the prevention of unsuspected pulmonary embolism in patients with active cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective and parallel group study was performed on 64 cancer patients (29 males and 35 females) with APE. A multidetector CT angiography with high spatial and temporal resolution and quality of arterial opacification was used to make the diagnosis. Lung scintigraphy was reserved to selected patients only. Patients were randomized to either the warfarin (Group A) or the fondaparinux (Group B) for 90 days. The first end point of efficacy was the persistence, reduction, or disappearance of thrombosis after 90 days. The second end point was the reappearance of thrombosis after 1 year. The first end point of safety was the development of major bleeding.

resultsWe enrolled 32 patients into each treatment group. We reached the first end point of efficacy and safety in Group B which showed that fondaparinux was able to induce the disappearance of thrombotic pulmonary with a lower incidence of major bleeding events compared with warfarin. No difference in the secondary end point was recorded.

conclusionWe suggest that the treatment of cancer patients with APE can be oriented with the administration of a standard dose of fondaparinux until the next CT lung control (3 months). However, the lack of a randomized clinical trial, including a larger patient cohort, does not allow formulation of final recommendations in these patients. A broader study would be desirable, involving a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up period.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsAntineoplastic AgentsFemaleFondaparinuxHumansMaleNeoplasmsPolysaccharidesPulmonary EmbolismWarfarinAnticoagulantsAntineoplastic AgentsFondaparinuxPolysaccharidesWarfarinasymptomatic pulmonary embolismcancer patientsfondaparinuxwarfarin

Identifiers

PMID27382257
PMCPMC4922788
OpenAlexW2465702436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.