Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27382226›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2016

Precycle Estradiol in Synchronization and Scheduling of Antagonist Cycles.

Shilpa Saple, Mukesh Agrawal, Simi Kawar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shilpa SapleAarush IVF and Endoscopy Centre, Prathamesh Harmony, Gautam Buddha Lane, Opposite Orlem Church, Marve Road, Malad West, Mumbai, 400064 India.
Mukesh AgrawalAarush IVF and Endoscopy Centre, Prathamesh Harmony, Gautam Buddha Lane, Opposite Orlem Church, Marve Road, Malad West, Mumbai, 400064 India.
Simi KawarAarush IVF and Endoscopy Centre, Prathamesh Harmony, Gautam Buddha Lane, Opposite Orlem Church, Marve Road, Malad West, Mumbai, 400064 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antagonist cycles have an inherent issue of lack of flexibility. As a result where batching of cycles is desired, it is not the preferred protocol in ART cycles. There is also the limitation of ovarian response in antagonist cycle due to the size heterogenesities of antral follicles at the start of stimulation. Among the different options available, use of estrogen in the luteal phase of the preceding cycle has definitely shown benefits with regard to better control of cycle as well as synchronization of follicles available for stimulation. The article gives a detailed analysis of the different options available for timing the egg collection in antagonist cycles, the advantages and drawbacks, and the method of use of estrogen. Whereas in the majority of the trials where estrogen pretreatment was used, the goal of scheduling of egg collection was definitely achieved, increased duration and dose of gonadotropin stimulation were required. There was definite advantage of higher oocyte yield in these cycles. The possibility of premature LH rise later during stimulation and subsequent poor implantation in these cycles has to be further evaluated. Nevertheless, batching of patient friendly antagonist cycles can be effectively possible by use of precycle estrogen treatment.

Indexed as

Antagonist cyclePrecycle estrogenSynchronization

Identifiers

PMID27382226
PMCPMC4912497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.